Loading…

Contrast‐Enhanced Ultrasound of Muscle Perfusion May Indicate Patient Response to Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy

Purpose Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support is associated with peripheral vascular abnormalities beyond those associated with heart failure (HF). These abnormalities are associated with persistent functional impairments that adversely impact quality of life (QoL). Methods for measuring per...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of ultrasound in medicine 2021-12, Vol.40 (12), p.2675-2683
Main Authors: Delaney, Lauren J., Fitzgerald, Kathleen, Stanczak, Maria, Machado, Priscilla, Entwistle, John W. C., Forsberg, Flemming, Reeves, Gordon R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support is associated with peripheral vascular abnormalities beyond those associated with heart failure (HF). These abnormalities are associated with persistent functional impairments that adversely impact quality of life (QoL). Methods for measuring peripheral vascular function in this population are needed. Methods This pilot study investigated the use of contrast‐enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) using standardized protocols to estimate changes in peripheral (quadriceps) muscle perfusion among patients with HF (INTERMACS profile 3) undergoing LVAD implantation (n = 7). Patients were then stratified by those who did (“responders”, n = 4) and did not (“nonresponders”, n = 3) report QoL improvement with LVAD support. Results Serial measurements obtained preoperatively and 3 months following LVAD implantation showed no significant change (P > .23) in muscle perfusion by all CEUS‐based measures at rest or with an exercise stimulus for the overall population. Responders exhibited improved muscle perfusion at rest (P = .043) and decreased time to peak contrast enhancement (P = .010) at 3 months compared with baseline, suggesting improved delivery of blood to the extremities post‐LVAD. Nonresponders showed unchanged resting muscle perfusion (P > .99), time to peak contrast enhancement (P = .59), and response to exercise stimulus (P > .99) following LVAD therapy. Conclusion Our findings suggest that CEUS evaluation is a promising noninvasive, quantitative modality for real‐time assessment of peripheral vasculature and muscle perfusion as an indication of treatment response in LVAD recipients and that this modality may capture perfusion measures important to QoL following LVAD implantation.
ISSN:0278-4297
1550-9613
DOI:10.1002/jum.15658