Practical methods for segmentation and calculation of brain volume and intracranial volume: a guide and comparison

• Published in: Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery 2022-07, Vol.12 (7), p.3748-3761
• Main Authors: Harkey, Thomas, Baker, David, Hagen, John, Scott, Hayden, Palys, Viktoras
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Original
• ISSN: 2223-4292; 2223-4306
• DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-958

BackgroundAccurate segmentation and calculation of total brain volume (BV) and intracranial volume (ICV) (further-volumetry) may serve various clinical tasks and research studies in neuroscience. Manual segmentation is extremely time consuming. There is a relative lack of published broad recommendations and comparisons of tools for automated volumetry, especially for users without expertise in computer science, for settings with limited resources, and when neuroimaging quality is suboptimal due to clinical circumstances. Our objective is to decrease the barrier to entry for research and clinical groups to perform volumetric cranial imaging analysis using free and reliable software tools. MethodsAutomated volumetry from computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans was accomplished using 3D Slicer (v. 4.11.0), FreeSurfer (v. 7.1.1), and volBrain (v. 1.0) in a cohort of 39 patients with ischemic middle cerebral artery territory brain infarcts in the acute stage. Visual inspection for accuracy was also performed. Statistical analysis included coefficient of determination (R2) and Bland-Altman (B-A) plots. A multifaceted comparison between 3D Slicer, FreeSurfer, and volBrain from practical user perspective was performed to compile a list of distinguishing features. ResultsBV: FreeSurfer, 3D Slicer, and volBrain provide similar estimations when high quality T1-MRI scans with 1 mm slices (3D scans) are available, whereas 3 mm and thicker slices (2D scans) introduce a dispersion in results. ICV: the most accurate volumetry is provided by 3D Slicer using CT scans. volBrain uses T1-MRIs and also provides good results which agree with 3D Slicer. Both of these methods may be more trustworthy than T1 MRI-derived FreeSurfer calculations. ConclusionsAll three studied tools of automated intracranial and brain volumetry-3D Slicer, FreeSurfer, and volBrain-are free, reliable, require no complex programming, but still have certain limitations and significant differences. Based on our investigation findings, the readers should be able to select the right volumetry tool and neuroimaging study, and then follow provided step-by-step instructions to accomplish specific volumetry tasks.