Loading…

Protective effect of house screening against indoor Aedes aegypti in Mérida, Mexico: A cluster randomised controlled trial

Objective To evaluate the protective effect of house screening (HS) on indoor Aedes aegypti infestation, abundance and arboviral infection in Merida, Mexico. Methods In 2019, we performed a cluster randomised controlled trial (6 control and 6 intervention areas: 100 households/area). Intervention cl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Tropical medicine & international health 2021-12, Vol.26 (12), p.1677-1688
Main Authors: Manrique‐Saide, Pablo, Herrera‐Bojórquez, Josué, Villegas‐Chim, Josué, Puerta‐Guardo, Henry, Ayora‐Talavera, Guadalupe, Parra‐Cardeña, Manuel, Medina‐Barreiro, Anuar, Ramírez‐Medina, Marypaz, Chi‐Ku, Aylin, Trujillo‐Peña, Emilio, Méndez‐Vales, Rosa E., Delfín‐González, Hugo, Toledo‐Romaní, María E., Bazzani, Roberto, Bolio‐Arceo, Edgardo, Gómez‐Dantés, Hector, Che‐Mendoza, Azael, Pavía‐Ruz, Norma, Kirstein, Oscar D., Vazquez‐Prokopec, Gonzalo M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective To evaluate the protective effect of house screening (HS) on indoor Aedes aegypti infestation, abundance and arboviral infection in Merida, Mexico. Methods In 2019, we performed a cluster randomised controlled trial (6 control and 6 intervention areas: 100 households/area). Intervention clusters received permanently fixed fiberglass HS on all windows and doors. The study included two cross‐sectional entomologic surveys, one baseline (dry season in May 2019) and one post‐intervention (PI, rainy season between September and October 2019). The presence and number of indoor Aedes females and blood‐fed females (indoor mosquito infestation) as well as arboviral infections with dengue (DENV) and Zika (ZIKV) viruses were evaluated in a subsample of 30 houses within each cluster. Results HS houses had significantly lower risk for having Aedes aegypti female mosquitoes (odds ratio [OR] = 0.56, 95% CI 0.33–0.97, p = 0.04) and blood‐fed females (OR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.28–0.97, p = 0.04) than unscreened households from the control arm. Compared to control houses, HS houses had significantly lower indoor Ae. aegypti abundance (rate ratio [RR] = 0.50, 95% CI 0.30–0.83, p = 0.01), blood‐fed Ae. aegypti females (RR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.27–0.85, p = 0.01) and female Ae. aegypti positive for arboviruses (OR = 0.29, 95% CI 0.10–0.86, p = 0.02). The estimated intervention efficacy in reducing Ae. aegypti arbovirus infection was 71%. Conclusions These results provide evidence supporting the use of HS as an effective pesticide‐free method to control house infestations with Aedes aegypti and reduce the transmission of Aedes‐transmitted viruses such as DENV, chikungunya (CHIKV) and ZIKV.
ISSN:1360-2276
1365-3156
DOI:10.1111/tmi.13680