Work Engagement, Work Environment, and Psychological Distress during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study in Ecuador

Work environments can interfere with the mental health of workers as generators or reducers of psychological distress. Work engagement is a concept related to quality of life and efficiency at work. The aim of this study was to find the relationship between work environment factors and work engageme...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Healthcare (Basel) 2022-07, Vol.10 (7), p.1330
Main Authors: Ruiz-Frutos, Carlos, Adanaqué-Bravo, Ingrid, Ortega-Moreno, Mónica, Fagundo-Rivera, Javier, Escobar-Segovia, Kenny, Arias-Ulloa, Cristian Arturo, Gómez-Salgado, Juan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
Cross-sectional studies
Disease transmission
Mental health
Pandemics
Population
Professionals
Questionnaires
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
Social distancing
Social networks
Sociodemographics
Telecommuting
Variables
Work environment
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Work environments can interfere with the mental health of workers as generators or reducers of psychological distress. Work engagement is a concept related to quality of life and efficiency at work. The aim of this study was to find the relationship between work environment factors and work engagement among the Ecuadorian general population during the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic to assess their levels of psychological distress. For this purpose, a cross-sectional, descriptive study using a set of questionnaires was performed. Sociodemographic and work environment data, work engagement (UWES-9 scale) scores, and General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) scores were collected. The variables that predicted 70.2% of psychological distress during the first phase of the pandemic were being female, with a low level of vigour (work engagement dimension), being stressed at work, and low job satisfaction. The sample showed an intermediate level of engagement in both the global assessment and the three dimensions, being higher in those without psychological distress. With effective actions on work environment factors, mental health effects may be efficiently prevented, and work engagement may be benefited. Companies can reduce workers’ psychological distress by providing safe and effective means to prevent the risk of contagion; reducing the levels of work conflict, work stress, or workload; and supporting their employees with psychological measures in order to maintain ideal working conditions.
ISSN:2227-9032
2227-9032
DOI:10.3390/healthcare10071330