The impact of clinical result acquisition and interpretation on task performance during a simulated pediatric cardiac arrest: a multicentre observational study

• Published in: Canadian journal of emergency medicine 2022-08, Vol.24 (5), p.529-534
• Main Authors: Rizkalla, Carol, Garcia-Jorda, Dailys, Cheng, Adam, Duff, Jonathan P., Gottesman, Ronald, Weiss, Matthew J., Koot, Deanna A., Gilfoyle, Elaine
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Cardiac arrest; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; CPR; Defibrillators; Emergency Medicine; Heart attacks; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Observational studies; Original Research; Pediatrics; Public Health; Simulation
• ISSN: 1481-8035; 1481-8043
• DOI: 10.1007/s43678-022-00313-0

Purpose The acquisition and interpretation of clinical results during resuscitations is common; however, this can delay critical clinical tasks, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality. This study aims to determine the impact of clinical result acquisition and interpretation by the team leader on critical task completion during simulated pediatric cardiac arrest before and after team training. Methods This is a secondary data analysis of video-recorded simulated resuscitation scenarios conducted during Teams4Kids ( T4K ) study (June 2011–January 2015); scenarios included cardiac arrest before and after team training. The scenario included either a scripted paper or a phone call delivery of results concurrently with a clinical transition to pulseless ventricular tachycardia. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used to compare team performance before and after training. Results Performance from 40 teams was analyzed. Although the time taken to initiate CPR and defibrillation varied depending on the type of interruption and whether the scenario was before or after team training, these findings were not significantly associated with the leader's behaviour [Kruskal–Wallis test ( p  > 0.05)]. An exact McNemar’s test determined no statistically significant difference in the proportion of leaders involved or not in interpreting results between and after the training (exact p value = 0.096). Conclusions Team training was successful in reducing time to perform key clinical tasks. Although team training modified the way leaders behaved toward the results, this behaviour change did not impact the time taken to start CPR or defibrillate. Further understanding the elements that influence time to critical clinical tasks provides guidance in designing future simulated educational activities, subsequently improving clinical team performance and patient outcomes.