Loading…

Mechanism of commitment to a mating partner in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In mating in yeast, cells use mobile polarity sites to explore the cortex until they come into alignment with a partner, at which point the polarity site stops moving and the cells “commit” to each other. The outstanding question of how the cells know when they have reached alignment is addressed. M...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Molecular biology of the cell 2022-10, Vol.33 (12), p.ar112-ar112
Main Authors: Jacobs, Katherine C., Gorman, Olivia, Lew, Daniel J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In mating in yeast, cells use mobile polarity sites to explore the cortex until they come into alignment with a partner, at which point the polarity site stops moving and the cells “commit” to each other. The outstanding question of how the cells know when they have reached alignment is addressed. Many cells detect and follow gradients of chemical signals to perform their functions. Yeast cells use gradients of extracellular pheromones to locate mating partners, providing a tractable model for understanding how cells decode the spatial information in gradients. To mate, yeast cells must orient polarity toward the mating partner. Polarity sites are mobile, exploring the cell cortex until they reach the proper position, where they stop moving and “commit” to the partner. A simple model to explain commitment posits that a high concentration of pheromone is detected only upon alignment of partner cells’ polarity sites and causes polarity site movement to stop. Here we explore how yeast cells respond to partners that make different amounts of pheromone. Commitment was surprisingly robust to various pheromone levels, ruling out the simple model. We also tested whether adaptive pathways were responsible for the robustness of commitment, but our results show that cells lacking those pathways were still able to accommodate changes in pheromone. To explain this robustness, we suggest that the steep pheromone gradients near each mating partner’s polarity site trap the polarity site in place.
ISSN:1059-1524
1939-4586
DOI:10.1091/mbc.E22-02-0043