Nonlinear Microscale Mechanics of Actin Networks Governed by Coupling of Filament Crosslinking and Stabilization

• Published in: Polymers 2022-11, Vol.14 (22), p.4980
• Main Authors: Dwyer, Mike E, Robertson-Anderson, Rae M, Gurmessa, Bekele J
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Actin; Binding proteins; Biomimetics; Connectivity; Crosslinked polymers; Crosslinking; Filaments; Laboratories; Lasers; Mechanical analysis; Mechanical properties; Muscle proteins; Networks; Nonlinear response; Polymerization; Protein binding; Proteins; Ratios; Stabilization; Stiffening; Stiffness; Switches; Viscoelasticity
• ISSN: 2073-4360; 2073-4360
• DOI: 10.3390/polym14224980

Actin plays a vital role in maintaining the stability and rigidity of biological cells while allowing for cell motility and shape change. The semiflexible nature of actin filaments-along with the myriad actin-binding proteins (ABPs) that serve to crosslink, bundle, and stabilize filaments-are central to this multifunctionality. The effect of ABPs on the structural and mechanical properties of actin networks has been the topic of fervent investigation over the past few decades. Yet, the combined impact of filament stabilization, stiffening and crosslinking via ABPs on the mechanical response of actin networks has yet to be explored. Here, we perform optical tweezers microrheology measurements to characterize the nonlinear force response and relaxation dynamics of actin networks in the presence of varying concentrations of α-actinin, which transiently crosslinks actin filaments, and phalloidin, which stabilizes filamentous actin and increases its persistence length. We show that crosslinking and stabilization can act both synergistically and antagonistically to tune the network resistance to nonlinear straining. For example, phalloidin stabilization leads to enhanced elastic response and reduced dissipation at large strains and timescales, while the initial microscale force response is reduced compared to networks without phalloidin. Moreover, we find that stabilization switches this initial response from that of stress stiffening to softening despite the increased filament stiffness that phalloidin confers. Finally, we show that both crosslinking and stabilization are necessary to elicit these emergent features, while the effect of stabilization on networks without crosslinkers is much more subdued. We suggest that these intriguing mechanical properties arise from the competition and cooperation between filament connectivity, bundling, and rigidification, shedding light on how ABPs with distinct roles can act in concert to mediate diverse mechanical properties of the cytoskeleton and bio-inspired polymeric materials.