Education level modifies parental hesitancy about COVID-19 vaccinations for their children

• Published in: Vaccine 2023-01, Vol.41 (2), p.496-503
• Main Authors: Tang, Shuning, Liu, Xin, Jia, Yingnan, Chen, Hao, Zheng, Pinpin, Fu, Hua, Xiao, Qianyi
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Child; Children; Children & youth; Copying; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; COVID-19 - prevention & control; COVID-19 vaccines; COVID-19 Vaccines - therapeutic use; Demographic variables; Disease transmission; Education; Educational Status; Effectiveness; Families & family life; Family income; Health behavior; Health care; Herd immunity; Humans; Immunity; Infectious diseases; Morbidity; Motivation; Parents; Parents & parenting; Protection motivation theory; Public health; Quality control; Questionnaires; Regression analysis; Semantics; Sociodemographics; Vaccination; Vaccine hesitancy; Vaccines; Validity
• ISSN: 0264-410X; 1873-2518
• DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.11.060

It is important to encourage parental acceptance of children’s vaccination against COVID-19 to ensure population immunity and mitigate morbidity and mortality. This study drew upon protection motivation theory (PMT) to explore the factors of parental hesitancy about vaccinating their children. A national online survey was performed in China. A total of 2054 Chinese parents of children aged 6–12 years were included in this study. They reported on measures that assessed hesitancy about children’s vaccination against COVID-19, PMT constructs (susceptibility, severity, response efficacy, self-efficacy, and response costs) and sociodemographic characteristics. Chinese parents reported a hesitancy rate of 29.4% for children’s vaccination. Parents with higher level education were more likely to hesitate to vaccinate their children against COVID-19. After controlling for parents’ and children’s demographic variables, logistic regression showed that parents’ hesitancy about their children’s vaccination increased if parents had lower levels of susceptibility, response efficacy or self-efficacy, as well as higher levels of response costs. In addition, a high educational level can significantly increase the promotive effect of response cost and the protective effect of response efficacy on vaccine hesitancy. In conclusion, our findings suggested that PMT can explain parents' vaccine hesitancy and that education level can modify the effect of copying appraisal, but not threat appraisal, on parental hesitancy. This study will help public health officials send targeted messages to parents to improve the rate of COVID-19 vaccination in children aged 6–12 years and thus reach a higher level of immunity in the population.