Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on substance availability, accessibility, pricing, and quality: A multicenter study from India

• Published in: Indian journal of psychiatry 2022-09, Vol.64 (5), p.466-472
• Main Authors: Arya, Sidharth, Ghosh, Abhishek, Mishra, Shree, Swami, Mukesh, Prasad, Sambhu, Somani, Aditya, Basu, Aniruddha, Sharma, Kshitiz, Padhy, Susanta, Nebhinani, Naresh, Singh, Lokesh, Choudhury, Shinjini, Basu, Debasish, Gupta, Rajiv
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Alcohol; Cannabis; Care and treatment; COVID-19; Drug abuse; Drug addiction; Drug dependence; Heroin; Narcotics; Opioids; Original; Pricing; Shelter in place; Substance abuse; Surveys; Tobacco
• ISSN: 0019-5545; 1998-3794
• DOI: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_864_21

Background and Aim: Pandemic and consequent lockdowns are likely to affect the drug market by the sudden disruption of the supply chain. We explored the change in the availability, access, purity, and pricing during lockdown from respondents seeking treatment for drugs, alcohol, and tobacco dependence. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 404 respondents from seven treatment centers across India. A structured questionnaire assessed the change in availability, access, quality, and price of substances used during the first phase (March 24-April 14) and the second phase (April 15-May 3) of lockdown. Results: A majority of the respondents in treatment used tobacco (63%) and alcohol (52%). Relatively few respondents used opioids (45%) or cannabis (5%). Heroin (44%) was the most common opioid the respondents were treated for. Seventy-five percent, 65%, and 60% of respondents treated for alcohol, tobacco, and opioid problems, respectively, reported a reduction in the availability and access during the first phase of the lockdown. In the second phase, respondents with alcohol and tobacco dependence reported greater availability than those with opioid and cannabis dependence. The reported price of all substances increased more than 50% during the first phase of lockdown and remained higher throughout the second phase. Deterioration in purity was reported by more than half of the people who used opioid. Conclusion: Lockdown could have affected both licit and illicit drug markets, albeit to a varying degree. The observed changes seemed short-lasting, as suggested by the recovering trends during the second phase of lockdown.