Loading…
Outcomes and perception of cloud-based remote patient monitoring in children receiving automated peritoneal dialysis: a prospective study
Background Remote patient monitoring (RPM) for automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) may improve clinical outcomes. Paediatric data, however, remain extremely scarce. Methods We conducted a prospective observational study of children (0–18 years) receiving APD with cloud-based RPM over two 24-week per...
Saved in:
Published in: | Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, West) West), 2023-07, Vol.38 (7), p.2171-2178 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Remote patient monitoring (RPM) for automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) may improve clinical outcomes. Paediatric data, however, remain extremely scarce.
Methods
We conducted a prospective observational study of children (0–18 years) receiving APD with cloud-based RPM over two 24-week periods (pre- and post-RPM). Primary outcomes were unplanned hospitalizations and fluid management. Children receiving APD without RPM (non-RPM) were included as control.
Results
Seven patients (6 females) receiving APD were enrolled in the RPM programme at 11.3 years (IQR 2.6–17.1). Main indications for RPM included history of fluid overload (
n
= 3) and non-adherence (
n
= 2). Ten children were included in the non-RPM group (6 females; 16.9 years, IQR 12.8–17.6). Four patients (57.1%, 95% CI 22.5–100%) experienced fewer unplanned hospitalizations and 5 patients (71.4%, 95% CI 34.1–100%) had shorter hospital stays during the post-RPM period. The hospitalization rates and length of stay were reduced by 45% and 42%, respectively. The higher hospitalization rates among the RPM group, compared to the non-RPM group, were no longer observed following implementation of RPM. There was a significant increase in ultrafiltration (565.6 ± 248.7 vs. 501.7 ± 286.6 ml/day,
p
= 0.03) and reduction in systolic blood pressure (114.1 ± 12.6 vs. 119.9 ± 11.19 mmHg,
p
= 0.02) during the post-RPM period. All patients demonstrated satisfactory adherence. Although quality of life (PedsQL 3.0 ESRD module) was not different pre- and post-RPM, all patients agreed in the questionnaires that the use of RPM improved their quality of life and sense of security.
Conclusions
In conclusion, RPM in children receiving APD is associated with fewer and shorter unplanned hospitalizations, improved fluid management and favourable adherence to PD.
Graphical abstract
A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as
Supplementary information |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0931-041X 1432-198X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00467-022-05828-3 |