Loading…

Outcomes and perception of cloud-based remote patient monitoring in children receiving automated peritoneal dialysis: a prospective study

Background Remote patient monitoring (RPM) for automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) may improve clinical outcomes. Paediatric data, however, remain extremely scarce. Methods We conducted a prospective observational study of children (0–18 years) receiving APD with cloud-based RPM over two 24-week per...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, West) West), 2023-07, Vol.38 (7), p.2171-2178
Main Authors: Chan, Eugene Yu-hin, Liu, Mei-shan, Or, Po-chu, Ma, Alison Lap-tak
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Remote patient monitoring (RPM) for automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) may improve clinical outcomes. Paediatric data, however, remain extremely scarce. Methods We conducted a prospective observational study of children (0–18 years) receiving APD with cloud-based RPM over two 24-week periods (pre- and post-RPM). Primary outcomes were unplanned hospitalizations and fluid management. Children receiving APD without RPM (non-RPM) were included as control. Results Seven patients (6 females) receiving APD were enrolled in the RPM programme at 11.3 years (IQR 2.6–17.1). Main indications for RPM included history of fluid overload ( n  = 3) and non-adherence ( n  = 2). Ten children were included in the non-RPM group (6 females; 16.9 years, IQR 12.8–17.6). Four patients (57.1%, 95% CI 22.5–100%) experienced fewer unplanned hospitalizations and 5 patients (71.4%, 95% CI 34.1–100%) had shorter hospital stays during the post-RPM period. The hospitalization rates and length of stay were reduced by 45% and 42%, respectively. The higher hospitalization rates among the RPM group, compared to the non-RPM group, were no longer observed following implementation of RPM. There was a significant increase in ultrafiltration (565.6 ± 248.7 vs. 501.7 ± 286.6 ml/day, p  = 0.03) and reduction in systolic blood pressure (114.1 ± 12.6 vs. 119.9 ± 11.19 mmHg, p  = 0.02) during the post-RPM period. All patients demonstrated satisfactory adherence. Although quality of life (PedsQL 3.0 ESRD module) was not different pre- and post-RPM, all patients agreed in the questionnaires that the use of RPM improved their quality of life and sense of security. Conclusions In conclusion, RPM in children receiving APD is associated with fewer and shorter unplanned hospitalizations, improved fluid management and favourable adherence to PD. Graphical abstract A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information
ISSN:0931-041X
1432-198X
DOI:10.1007/s00467-022-05828-3