SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among 77,587 healthcare workers: a national observational longitudinal cohort study in Wales, United Kingdom, April to November 2020

• Published in: Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2022-12, Vol.115 (12), p.467-478
• Main Authors: Hollinghurst, Joe, North, Laura, Szakmany, Tamas, Pugh, Richard, Davies, Gwyneth A, Sivakumaran, Shanya, Jarvis, Rebecca, Rolles, Martin, Pickrell, W Owen, Akbari, Ashley, Davies, Gareth, Griffiths, Rowena, Lyons, Jane, Torabi, Fatemeh, Fry, Richard, Gravenor, Mike B, Lyons, Ronan A
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Cohort Studies; COVID-19 - epidemiology; Health Personnel; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; SARS-CoV-2; United Kingdom - epidemiology
• ISSN: 0141-0768; 1758-1095
• DOI: 10.1177/01410768221107119

Objectives To better understand the risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection among healthcare workers, leading to recommendations for the prioritisation of personal protective equipment, testing, training and vaccination. Design Observational, longitudinal, national cohort study. Setting Our cohort were secondary care (hospital-based) healthcare workers employed by NHS Wales (United Kingdom) organisations from 1 April 2020 to 30 November 2020. Participants We included 577,756 monthly observations among 77,587 healthcare workers. Using linked anonymised datasets, participants were grouped into 20 staff roles. Additionally, each role was deemed either patient-facing, non-patient-facing or undetermined. This was linked to individual demographic details and dates of positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests. Main outcome measures We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression models to determine odds ratios (ORs) for the risk of a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test. Results Patient-facing healthcare workers were at the highest risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection with an adjusted OR (95% confidence interval [CI]) of 2.28 (95% CI 2.10–2.47). We found that after adjustment, foundation year doctors (OR 1.83 [95% CI 1.47–2.27]), healthcare support workers [OR 1.36 [95% CI 1.20–1.54]) and hospital nurses (OR 1.27 [95% CI 1.12–1.44]) were at the highest risk of infection among all staff groups. Younger healthcare workers and those living in more deprived areas were at a higher risk of infection. We also observed that infection rates varied over time and by organisation. Conclusions These findings have important policy implications for the prioritisation of vaccination, testing, training and personal protective equipment provision for patient-facing roles and the higher risk staff groups.