Loading…

Lung ultrasound as a screening tool for SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in surgical patients

Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of lung ultrasound (LUS) in screening for SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in patients requiring surgery. Methods Patients underwent a LUS protocol that included a scoring system for screening COVID‐19 pneumonia as well as RT‐PCR test for SARS‐CoV‐2. The receiver o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical ultrasound 2022-11, Vol.50 (9), p.1271-1278
Main Authors: García, Alberto F., Ángel‐Isaza, Ana María, Chica, Julian, Estrada, David Esteban, Vargas‐Morales, Carlos Andrés, Revelo‐Noguera, Jorge, Morell, Tatiana, Gómez, Jeison Antonio, Rodríguez Holguín, Fernando, Umaña, Mauricio, Serna, José Julián, Carvajal, Sandra
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of lung ultrasound (LUS) in screening for SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in patients requiring surgery. Methods Patients underwent a LUS protocol that included a scoring system for screening COVID‐19 pneumonia as well as RT‐PCR test for SARS‐CoV‐2. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was determined for the relationship between LUS score and PCR test results for COVID‐19. The optimal threshold for the best discrimination between non‐COVID‐19 patients and COVID‐19 patients was calculated. Results Among 203 patients enrolled (mean age 48 years; 82 males), 8.3% were COVID‐19‐positive; 4.9% were diagnosed via the initial RT‐PCR test. Of the patients diagnosed with SARS‐CoV‐2, 64.7% required in‐hospital management and 17.6% died. The most common ultrasound findings were B lines (19.7%) and a thickened pleura (19.2%). The AUC of the ROC curve of the relationship of LUS score with a cutoff value >8 versus RT‐PCR test for the assessment of SARS‐CoV‐2 pneumonia was 0.75 (95% CI 0.61–0.89; sensitivity 52.9%; specificity 91%; LR (+) 6.15, LR (−) 0.51). Conclusion The LUS score in surgical patients is not a useful tool for screening patients with potential COVID‐19 infection. LUS score shows a high specificity with a cut‐off value of 8. In a high prevalence setting of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, lung ultrasound severity score (LUSS) > 8 showed a high specificity. However, it cannot be recommended as a screening tool in patients requiring surgery due to its low sensitivity. B lines and subpleural consolidations had the best performance at identifying patients with pneumonia.
ISSN:0091-2751
1097-0096
DOI:10.1002/jcu.23358