Loading…

Street environments and crime around low-income and minority schools: Adopting an environmental audit tool to assess crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED)

•CPTED principles have been applied in school neighborhood safety.•Multiple crime types had significant associations with CPTED principles.•The cleanliness of streets and visual quality of buildings can reduce crime.•Being adjacent to multi-family housing and bus stops can increase crime.•The findin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Landscape and urban planning 2023-04, Vol.232, p.104676, Article 104676
Main Authors: Lee, Sungmin, Lee, Chanam, Won Nam, Ji, Vernez Moudon, Anne, Mendoza, Jason A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•CPTED principles have been applied in school neighborhood safety.•Multiple crime types had significant associations with CPTED principles.•The cleanliness of streets and visual quality of buildings can reduce crime.•Being adjacent to multi-family housing and bus stops can increase crime.•The findings add to the evidence supporting the effectiveness of CPTED initiatives. Crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) suggests an association between micro-scale environmental conditions and crime, but little empirical research exists on the detailed street-level environmental features associated with crime near low-income and minority schools. This study focuses on the neighborhoods around 14 elementary schools serving lower income populations in Seattle, WA to assess if the distribution of crime incidences (2013–2017) is linked with the street-level environmental features that reflect CPTED principles. We used a total of 40 audit variables that were included in the four domains derived from the broken windows theory and CPTED principles: natural surveillance (e.g., number of windows, balconies, and a sense of surveillance), territoriality (e.g., crime watch signs, trees), image/maintenance (e.g., graffiti and a sense of maintenance/cleanness), and geographical juxtaposition (e.g., bus stops, presence of arterial). We found that multiple crime types had significant associations with CPTED components at the street level. Among the CPTED domains, two image/maintenance features (i.e., maintenance of streets and visual quality of buildings) and two geographical juxtaposition features (i.e., being adjacent to multi-family housing and bus stops) were consistently associated with both violent and property crime. The findings suggest that local efforts to improve maintenance of streets and visual quality of buildings and broader planning efforts to control specific land uses near schools are important to improve safety in marginalized neighborhoods near schools that tend to be more vulnerable to crime. Our research on micro-scale environmental determinants of crime can also serve as promising targets for CPTED research and initiatives.
ISSN:0169-2046
1872-6062
DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104676