Loading…
Minimizing CO emissions with renewable energy: a comparative study of emerging technologies in the steel industry
CO 2 emissions from the steel industry are amongst the most difficult to abate, since carbon is used as a stoichiometric reducing agent in most steel mills. This carbon ends up as a CO/CO 2 mixture in the steel mill gases, which are combusted to generate heat, electricity, and more CO 2 . Strategies...
Saved in:
Published in: | Energy & environmental science 2020-07, Vol.13 (7), p.1923-1932 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | CO
2
emissions from the steel industry are amongst the most difficult to abate, since carbon is used as a stoichiometric reducing agent in most steel mills. This carbon ends up as a CO/CO
2
mixture in the steel mill gases, which are combusted to generate heat, electricity, and more CO
2
. Strategies to capture and store (CCS), utilize (CCU) or avoid CO
2
in steel production exist, but are highly dependent on the availability of renewable electricity for the production of low-carbon H
2
. Steel mill gas contains energy, and can thus be re-used more easily than combustion gas or process gas from the cement industry. In this study, we evaluate several strategies to reduce CO
2
emissions in the steel industry and rank them according to their renewable electricity requirement. We propose the following steps: (1) shut down the steel plant's power plant, since it produces electricity with a carbon intensity that is even higher than coal-based power plants; (2) replace steel mill gas with natural gas to generate heat within the steel mill; (3) recover the reducing gases, H
2
and CO, from the steel mill gases:
e.g.
, using pressure swing adsorption to obtain a H
2
-rich stream from COG, and sorption-enhanced water gas shift to obtain a H
2
-rich stream and a pure CO
2
stream from BFG and BOFG; (4) the recovered H
2
converts some of the CO
2
to methanol, excess CO
2
is stored. The proposed CCUS scenario can retrofit existing infrastructure, uses proven technology and reduces CO
2
emissions by 70% for a marginal renewable electricity demand. Other energy-intensive alternatives have the potential to reduce CO
2
emissions by 85%, but require an order-of-magnitude more renewable electricity.
Implementing CCUS technologies at existing steel plants reduces CO
2
emissions by 70%, requiring 1.1 MW h per ton of renewable electricity. H
2
-based steel-making and CCU technologies require 4 and 8 times more electricity to reach similar reductions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1754-5692 1754-5706 |
DOI: | 10.1039/d0ee00787k |