The genesis of public-private innovation ecosystems: Bias and challenges

• Published in: Technological forecasting & social change 2021-01, Vol.162, p.120378, Article 120378
• Main Authors: Asplund, Fredrik, Björk, Jennie, Magnusson, Mats, Patrick, Adam J
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Application domains; Bias; Companies; Cyber-physical systems; Domains; Ecosystem genesis; Ecosystems; Electrical Engineering; Elektro- och systemteknik; Exploitation; Industrial Economics and Management; Industriell ekonomi och organisation; Innovation ecosystems; Innovations; Knowledge; Leadership; Loose coupling; Public-private cooperation; Technology; Value creation
• ISSN: 0040-1625; 1873-5509; 1873-5509
• DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120378

•The genesis of a pan-European public-private innovation ecosystem was studied.•Value creation was biased towards incumbent firms and complement challenges.•Participation was biased towards certain engineers and researchers.•Knowledge of application domains strongly contributed to the emergence of bias.•Appropriate management is required to avoid innovation ecosystem failure. The emergence of technology increasingly depends on innovation ecosystems and frequently involves actors from both industry and academia. However, value creation may experience challenges due to bias formed during public-private innovation ecosystem genesis. This empirical study of bias in a new pan-European public-private initiative provides results regarding innovation ecosystems and the individuals typically active during their genesis: value creation is biased towards the selection of incumbent firms and complement challenges, and participation is biased towards engineers with knowledge of exploitation from multiple domains and researchers with knowledge of exploitation from single domains. This suggests that the implications of the loose coupling emphasised by the innovation ecosystems discourse and the knowledge of the different contexts in which firms capture value are more complex than previously acknowledged. The practical implications are that the ability of public innovation ecosystem leadership to act early on novel technology might be offset by the inability of involved firms to commit to bringing the technology to market and that individuals typically active during public-private innovation ecosystems genesis are not ideal for handling this challenge. In fact, increasingly connected public leadership could smother the innovation ecosystem unless well-connected and multidisciplinary researchers are brought in as brokers.