Loading…

Deep learning for quadratic hedging in incomplete jump market

We propose a deep learning approach to study the minimal variance pricing and hedging problem in an incomplete jump diffusion market. It is based on a rigorous stochastic calculus derivation of the optimal hedging portfolio, optimal option price, and the corresponding equivalent martingale measure t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Digital finance 2024, Vol.6 (3), p.463-499
Main Authors: Agram, Nacira, Øksendal, Bernt, Rems, Jan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2265-266e53ed27bab0c9e65935fa182ee08c21c9e727050bc2b2a4b4bc931c0ade483
container_end_page 499
container_issue 3
container_start_page 463
container_title Digital finance
container_volume 6
creator Agram, Nacira
Øksendal, Bernt
Rems, Jan
description We propose a deep learning approach to study the minimal variance pricing and hedging problem in an incomplete jump diffusion market. It is based on a rigorous stochastic calculus derivation of the optimal hedging portfolio, optimal option price, and the corresponding equivalent martingale measure through the means of the Stackelberg game approach. A deep learning algorithm based on the combination of the feed-forward and LSTM neural networks is tested on three different market models, two of which are incomplete. In contrast, the complete market Black–Scholes model serves as a benchmark for the algorithm’s performance. The results that indicate the algorithm’s good performance are presented and discussed. In particular, we apply our results to the special incomplete market model studied by Merton and give a detailed comparison between our results based on the minimal variance principle and the results obtained by Merton based on a different pricing principle. Using deep learning, we find that the minimal variance principle leads to typically higher option prices than those deduced from the Merton principle. On the other hand, the minimal variance principle leads to lower losses than the Merton principle.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s42521-024-00112-5
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>swepub_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_kth_350816</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_DiVA_org_kth_350816</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2265-266e53ed27bab0c9e65935fa182ee08c21c9e727050bc2b2a4b4bc931c0ade483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EElXpD7DKDxjGE9tJFiyqlpdUiQ2wtRxnkqaPJDiJEH-PSwtLJEtjXd07j8PYtYAbAZDc9hIVCg4oOYAQyNUZmwRJci1Sff77z1J5yWZ9vwEATASghgm7WxJ10Y6sb-qmisrWRx-jLbwdahetqagOat2E59p9t6OBos2476K99VsarthFaXc9zU51yt4e7l8XT3z18vi8mK-4Q9SKo9akYiowyW0OLiOtsliVVqRIBKlDEbQEE1CQO8zRylzmLouFA1uQTOMp48e-_Sd1Y246X4cFvkxra7Os3-em9ZXZDmsTK0iFDn48-p1v-95T-ZcQYA7MzJGZCczMDzOjQig-DQnmpiJvNu3om3DXf6lv7CRuqg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Deep learning for quadratic hedging in incomplete jump market</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Agram, Nacira ; Øksendal, Bernt ; Rems, Jan</creator><creatorcontrib>Agram, Nacira ; Øksendal, Bernt ; Rems, Jan</creatorcontrib><description>We propose a deep learning approach to study the minimal variance pricing and hedging problem in an incomplete jump diffusion market. It is based on a rigorous stochastic calculus derivation of the optimal hedging portfolio, optimal option price, and the corresponding equivalent martingale measure through the means of the Stackelberg game approach. A deep learning algorithm based on the combination of the feed-forward and LSTM neural networks is tested on three different market models, two of which are incomplete. In contrast, the complete market Black–Scholes model serves as a benchmark for the algorithm’s performance. The results that indicate the algorithm’s good performance are presented and discussed. In particular, we apply our results to the special incomplete market model studied by Merton and give a detailed comparison between our results based on the minimal variance principle and the results obtained by Merton based on a different pricing principle. Using deep learning, we find that the minimal variance principle leads to typically higher option prices than those deduced from the Merton principle. On the other hand, the minimal variance principle leads to lower losses than the Merton principle.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2524-6984</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2524-6186</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2524-6186</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s42521-024-00112-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Banking ; Business Finance ; Deep learning ; Economics and Finance ; Equivalent martingale measure ; Finance ; Incomplete market ; LSTM ; Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics ; Merton model ; Option pricing ; Original Article</subject><ispartof>Digital finance, 2024, Vol.6 (3), p.463-499</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2265-266e53ed27bab0c9e65935fa182ee08c21c9e727050bc2b2a4b4bc931c0ade483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-350816$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Agram, Nacira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Øksendal, Bernt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rems, Jan</creatorcontrib><title>Deep learning for quadratic hedging in incomplete jump market</title><title>Digital finance</title><addtitle>Digit Finance</addtitle><description>We propose a deep learning approach to study the minimal variance pricing and hedging problem in an incomplete jump diffusion market. It is based on a rigorous stochastic calculus derivation of the optimal hedging portfolio, optimal option price, and the corresponding equivalent martingale measure through the means of the Stackelberg game approach. A deep learning algorithm based on the combination of the feed-forward and LSTM neural networks is tested on three different market models, two of which are incomplete. In contrast, the complete market Black–Scholes model serves as a benchmark for the algorithm’s performance. The results that indicate the algorithm’s good performance are presented and discussed. In particular, we apply our results to the special incomplete market model studied by Merton and give a detailed comparison between our results based on the minimal variance principle and the results obtained by Merton based on a different pricing principle. Using deep learning, we find that the minimal variance principle leads to typically higher option prices than those deduced from the Merton principle. On the other hand, the minimal variance principle leads to lower losses than the Merton principle.</description><subject>Banking</subject><subject>Business Finance</subject><subject>Deep learning</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Equivalent martingale measure</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Incomplete market</subject><subject>LSTM</subject><subject>Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics</subject><subject>Merton model</subject><subject>Option pricing</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><issn>2524-6984</issn><issn>2524-6186</issn><issn>2524-6186</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EElXpD7DKDxjGE9tJFiyqlpdUiQ2wtRxnkqaPJDiJEH-PSwtLJEtjXd07j8PYtYAbAZDc9hIVCg4oOYAQyNUZmwRJci1Sff77z1J5yWZ9vwEATASghgm7WxJ10Y6sb-qmisrWRx-jLbwdahetqagOat2E59p9t6OBos2476K99VsarthFaXc9zU51yt4e7l8XT3z18vi8mK-4Q9SKo9akYiowyW0OLiOtsliVVqRIBKlDEbQEE1CQO8zRylzmLouFA1uQTOMp48e-_Sd1Y246X4cFvkxra7Os3-em9ZXZDmsTK0iFDn48-p1v-95T-ZcQYA7MzJGZCczMDzOjQig-DQnmpiJvNu3om3DXf6lv7CRuqg</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>Agram, Nacira</creator><creator>Øksendal, Bernt</creator><creator>Rems, Jan</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AFDQA</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>D8V</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>Deep learning for quadratic hedging in incomplete jump market</title><author>Agram, Nacira ; Øksendal, Bernt ; Rems, Jan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2265-266e53ed27bab0c9e65935fa182ee08c21c9e727050bc2b2a4b4bc931c0ade483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Banking</topic><topic>Business Finance</topic><topic>Deep learning</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Equivalent martingale measure</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Incomplete market</topic><topic>LSTM</topic><topic>Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics</topic><topic>Merton model</topic><topic>Option pricing</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Agram, Nacira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Øksendal, Bernt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rems, Jan</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SWEPUB Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan full text</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SWEPUB Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>Digital finance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Agram, Nacira</au><au>Øksendal, Bernt</au><au>Rems, Jan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Deep learning for quadratic hedging in incomplete jump market</atitle><jtitle>Digital finance</jtitle><stitle>Digit Finance</stitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>463</spage><epage>499</epage><pages>463-499</pages><issn>2524-6984</issn><issn>2524-6186</issn><eissn>2524-6186</eissn><abstract>We propose a deep learning approach to study the minimal variance pricing and hedging problem in an incomplete jump diffusion market. It is based on a rigorous stochastic calculus derivation of the optimal hedging portfolio, optimal option price, and the corresponding equivalent martingale measure through the means of the Stackelberg game approach. A deep learning algorithm based on the combination of the feed-forward and LSTM neural networks is tested on three different market models, two of which are incomplete. In contrast, the complete market Black–Scholes model serves as a benchmark for the algorithm’s performance. The results that indicate the algorithm’s good performance are presented and discussed. In particular, we apply our results to the special incomplete market model studied by Merton and give a detailed comparison between our results based on the minimal variance principle and the results obtained by Merton based on a different pricing principle. Using deep learning, we find that the minimal variance principle leads to typically higher option prices than those deduced from the Merton principle. On the other hand, the minimal variance principle leads to lower losses than the Merton principle.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s42521-024-00112-5</doi><tpages>37</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2524-6984
ispartof Digital finance, 2024, Vol.6 (3), p.463-499
issn 2524-6984
2524-6186
2524-6186
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_kth_350816
source Springer Link
subjects Banking
Business Finance
Deep learning
Economics and Finance
Equivalent martingale measure
Finance
Incomplete market
LSTM
Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics
Merton model
Option pricing
Original Article
title Deep learning for quadratic hedging in incomplete jump market
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T17%3A05%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-swepub_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Deep%20learning%20for%20quadratic%20hedging%20in%20incomplete%20jump%20market&rft.jtitle=Digital%20finance&rft.au=Agram,%20Nacira&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=463&rft.epage=499&rft.pages=463-499&rft.issn=2524-6984&rft.eissn=2524-6186&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s42521-024-00112-5&rft_dat=%3Cswepub_cross%3Eoai_DiVA_org_kth_350816%3C/swepub_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2265-266e53ed27bab0c9e65935fa182ee08c21c9e727050bc2b2a4b4bc931c0ade483%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true