Loading…
Deep learning for quadratic hedging in incomplete jump market
We propose a deep learning approach to study the minimal variance pricing and hedging problem in an incomplete jump diffusion market. It is based on a rigorous stochastic calculus derivation of the optimal hedging portfolio, optimal option price, and the corresponding equivalent martingale measure t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Digital finance 2024, Vol.6 (3), p.463-499 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2265-266e53ed27bab0c9e65935fa182ee08c21c9e727050bc2b2a4b4bc931c0ade483 |
container_end_page | 499 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 463 |
container_title | Digital finance |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Agram, Nacira Øksendal, Bernt Rems, Jan |
description | We propose a deep learning approach to study the minimal variance pricing and hedging problem in an incomplete jump diffusion market. It is based on a rigorous stochastic calculus derivation of the optimal hedging portfolio, optimal option price, and the corresponding equivalent martingale measure through the means of the Stackelberg game approach. A deep learning algorithm based on the combination of the feed-forward and LSTM neural networks is tested on three different market models, two of which are incomplete. In contrast, the complete market Black–Scholes model serves as a benchmark for the algorithm’s performance. The results that indicate the algorithm’s good performance are presented and discussed. In particular, we apply our results to the special incomplete market model studied by Merton and give a detailed comparison between our results based on the minimal variance principle and the results obtained by Merton based on a different pricing principle. Using deep learning, we find that the minimal variance principle leads to typically higher option prices than those deduced from the Merton principle. On the other hand, the minimal variance principle leads to lower losses than the Merton principle. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s42521-024-00112-5 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>swepub_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_kth_350816</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_DiVA_org_kth_350816</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2265-266e53ed27bab0c9e65935fa182ee08c21c9e727050bc2b2a4b4bc931c0ade483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EElXpD7DKDxjGE9tJFiyqlpdUiQ2wtRxnkqaPJDiJEH-PSwtLJEtjXd07j8PYtYAbAZDc9hIVCg4oOYAQyNUZmwRJci1Sff77z1J5yWZ9vwEATASghgm7WxJ10Y6sb-qmisrWRx-jLbwdahetqagOat2E59p9t6OBos2476K99VsarthFaXc9zU51yt4e7l8XT3z18vi8mK-4Q9SKo9akYiowyW0OLiOtsliVVqRIBKlDEbQEE1CQO8zRylzmLouFA1uQTOMp48e-_Sd1Y246X4cFvkxra7Os3-em9ZXZDmsTK0iFDn48-p1v-95T-ZcQYA7MzJGZCczMDzOjQig-DQnmpiJvNu3om3DXf6lv7CRuqg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Deep learning for quadratic hedging in incomplete jump market</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Agram, Nacira ; Øksendal, Bernt ; Rems, Jan</creator><creatorcontrib>Agram, Nacira ; Øksendal, Bernt ; Rems, Jan</creatorcontrib><description>We propose a deep learning approach to study the minimal variance pricing and hedging problem in an incomplete jump diffusion market. It is based on a rigorous stochastic calculus derivation of the optimal hedging portfolio, optimal option price, and the corresponding equivalent martingale measure through the means of the Stackelberg game approach. A deep learning algorithm based on the combination of the feed-forward and LSTM neural networks is tested on three different market models, two of which are incomplete. In contrast, the complete market Black–Scholes model serves as a benchmark for the algorithm’s performance. The results that indicate the algorithm’s good performance are presented and discussed. In particular, we apply our results to the special incomplete market model studied by Merton and give a detailed comparison between our results based on the minimal variance principle and the results obtained by Merton based on a different pricing principle. Using deep learning, we find that the minimal variance principle leads to typically higher option prices than those deduced from the Merton principle. On the other hand, the minimal variance principle leads to lower losses than the Merton principle.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2524-6984</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2524-6186</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2524-6186</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s42521-024-00112-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Banking ; Business Finance ; Deep learning ; Economics and Finance ; Equivalent martingale measure ; Finance ; Incomplete market ; LSTM ; Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics ; Merton model ; Option pricing ; Original Article</subject><ispartof>Digital finance, 2024, Vol.6 (3), p.463-499</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2265-266e53ed27bab0c9e65935fa182ee08c21c9e727050bc2b2a4b4bc931c0ade483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-350816$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Agram, Nacira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Øksendal, Bernt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rems, Jan</creatorcontrib><title>Deep learning for quadratic hedging in incomplete jump market</title><title>Digital finance</title><addtitle>Digit Finance</addtitle><description>We propose a deep learning approach to study the minimal variance pricing and hedging problem in an incomplete jump diffusion market. It is based on a rigorous stochastic calculus derivation of the optimal hedging portfolio, optimal option price, and the corresponding equivalent martingale measure through the means of the Stackelberg game approach. A deep learning algorithm based on the combination of the feed-forward and LSTM neural networks is tested on three different market models, two of which are incomplete. In contrast, the complete market Black–Scholes model serves as a benchmark for the algorithm’s performance. The results that indicate the algorithm’s good performance are presented and discussed. In particular, we apply our results to the special incomplete market model studied by Merton and give a detailed comparison between our results based on the minimal variance principle and the results obtained by Merton based on a different pricing principle. Using deep learning, we find that the minimal variance principle leads to typically higher option prices than those deduced from the Merton principle. On the other hand, the minimal variance principle leads to lower losses than the Merton principle.</description><subject>Banking</subject><subject>Business Finance</subject><subject>Deep learning</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Equivalent martingale measure</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Incomplete market</subject><subject>LSTM</subject><subject>Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics</subject><subject>Merton model</subject><subject>Option pricing</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><issn>2524-6984</issn><issn>2524-6186</issn><issn>2524-6186</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EElXpD7DKDxjGE9tJFiyqlpdUiQ2wtRxnkqaPJDiJEH-PSwtLJEtjXd07j8PYtYAbAZDc9hIVCg4oOYAQyNUZmwRJci1Sff77z1J5yWZ9vwEATASghgm7WxJ10Y6sb-qmisrWRx-jLbwdahetqagOat2E59p9t6OBos2476K99VsarthFaXc9zU51yt4e7l8XT3z18vi8mK-4Q9SKo9akYiowyW0OLiOtsliVVqRIBKlDEbQEE1CQO8zRylzmLouFA1uQTOMp48e-_Sd1Y246X4cFvkxra7Os3-em9ZXZDmsTK0iFDn48-p1v-95T-ZcQYA7MzJGZCczMDzOjQig-DQnmpiJvNu3om3DXf6lv7CRuqg</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>Agram, Nacira</creator><creator>Øksendal, Bernt</creator><creator>Rems, Jan</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AFDQA</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>D8V</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>Deep learning for quadratic hedging in incomplete jump market</title><author>Agram, Nacira ; Øksendal, Bernt ; Rems, Jan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2265-266e53ed27bab0c9e65935fa182ee08c21c9e727050bc2b2a4b4bc931c0ade483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Banking</topic><topic>Business Finance</topic><topic>Deep learning</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Equivalent martingale measure</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Incomplete market</topic><topic>LSTM</topic><topic>Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics</topic><topic>Merton model</topic><topic>Option pricing</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Agram, Nacira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Øksendal, Bernt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rems, Jan</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SWEPUB Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan full text</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SWEPUB Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>Digital finance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Agram, Nacira</au><au>Øksendal, Bernt</au><au>Rems, Jan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Deep learning for quadratic hedging in incomplete jump market</atitle><jtitle>Digital finance</jtitle><stitle>Digit Finance</stitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>463</spage><epage>499</epage><pages>463-499</pages><issn>2524-6984</issn><issn>2524-6186</issn><eissn>2524-6186</eissn><abstract>We propose a deep learning approach to study the minimal variance pricing and hedging problem in an incomplete jump diffusion market. It is based on a rigorous stochastic calculus derivation of the optimal hedging portfolio, optimal option price, and the corresponding equivalent martingale measure through the means of the Stackelberg game approach. A deep learning algorithm based on the combination of the feed-forward and LSTM neural networks is tested on three different market models, two of which are incomplete. In contrast, the complete market Black–Scholes model serves as a benchmark for the algorithm’s performance. The results that indicate the algorithm’s good performance are presented and discussed. In particular, we apply our results to the special incomplete market model studied by Merton and give a detailed comparison between our results based on the minimal variance principle and the results obtained by Merton based on a different pricing principle. Using deep learning, we find that the minimal variance principle leads to typically higher option prices than those deduced from the Merton principle. On the other hand, the minimal variance principle leads to lower losses than the Merton principle.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s42521-024-00112-5</doi><tpages>37</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2524-6984 |
ispartof | Digital finance, 2024, Vol.6 (3), p.463-499 |
issn | 2524-6984 2524-6186 2524-6186 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_kth_350816 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Banking Business Finance Deep learning Economics and Finance Equivalent martingale measure Finance Incomplete market LSTM Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics Merton model Option pricing Original Article |
title | Deep learning for quadratic hedging in incomplete jump market |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T17%3A05%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-swepub_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Deep%20learning%20for%20quadratic%20hedging%20in%20incomplete%20jump%20market&rft.jtitle=Digital%20finance&rft.au=Agram,%20Nacira&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=463&rft.epage=499&rft.pages=463-499&rft.issn=2524-6984&rft.eissn=2524-6186&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s42521-024-00112-5&rft_dat=%3Cswepub_cross%3Eoai_DiVA_org_kth_350816%3C/swepub_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2265-266e53ed27bab0c9e65935fa182ee08c21c9e727050bc2b2a4b4bc931c0ade483%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |