How the duty to report prevents reporting and reinforces silence around sexual harassment within the police

Abstract Sworn police officers have a duty to report any legal offence that comes to their attention, and refraining from reporting constitutes misconduct. This article discusses the implications of the duty to report for handling sexual harassment within the Swedish police force. The discussion is...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Policing : a journal of policy and practice 2024-01, Vol.18
Main Authors: Lundgren, Silje, Wieslander, Malin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
anmälningsplikt
duty to report
misconduct
oegentligheter
Sexual harassment
sexuella trakasserier
silence
tystnad
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Sworn police officers have a duty to report any legal offence that comes to their attention, and refraining from reporting constitutes misconduct. This article discusses the implications of the duty to report for handling sexual harassment within the Swedish police force. The discussion is based on interviews with police officers and on testimonies from the 2017 #metoo call from Swedish police. We show that the duty to report contributes to silence about experiences of sexual harassment, since reporting might initiate a legal process and break ‘the blue code of silence’. The duty to report implies an approach to sexual harassment along a criminal logic, focusing on legal classification, documentation of proof, and witness tampering. This criminal logic individualizes sexual harassment, raises the bar for what is interpreted as harassment, and closes off alternative approaches to prevent organizational factors that enable harassment.
ISSN:1752-4512
1752-4520
1752-4520
DOI:10.1093/police/paae032