Mixtures of n-dodecyl-β- d-maltoside and hexaoxyethylene dodecyl ether — Surface properties, bulk properties, foam films, and foams

• Published in: Advances in colloid and interface science 2010-03, Vol.155 (1), p.5-18
• Main Authors: Stubenrauch, C., Claesson, P.M., Rutland, M., Manev, E., Johansson, I., Pedersen, J.S., Langevin, D., Blunk, D., Bain, C.D.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: and foams; bulk properties; Chemistry; Ethers; Foam films; Foams; Fysikalisk kemi; Hydration; Kemi; Mixtures of n-dodecyl-beta-D-maltoside and hexaoxyethylene dodecyl ether - Surface properties; NATURAL SCIENCES; NATURVETENSKAP; Non-ionic surfactants; Phase diagrams; Physical chemistry; Silicon dioxide; Surface and colloid chemistry; Surface chemistry; Surface properties; Surface properties Phase diagrams; Surfactant mixtures; Surfactants; Titanium dioxide; Yt- och kolloidkemi
• ISSN: 0001-8686; 1873-3727; 1873-3727
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2009.12.002

Mixtures of the two non-ionic surfactants hexaoxyethylene dodecyl ether (C 12E 6) and n-dodecyl-β- d-maltoside (β-C 12G 2) were studied with regard to surface properties, bulk properties, foam films, and foams. The reason for studying a mixture of an ethylene oxide (C i E j ) and a sugar (C n G m ) based surfactant is that despite being non-ionic, these two surfactants behave quite differently. Firstly, the physico-chemical properties of aqueous solutions of C n G m surfactants are less temperature-sensitive than those of C i E j solutions. Secondly, the surface charge density q 0 of foam films stabilized by C n G m surfactants is pH insensitive down to the so-called isoelectric point, while that of foam films stabilized by C i E j surfactants changes linearly with the pH. The third difference is related to interaction forces between solid surfaces. Under equilibrium conditions very high forces are needed to expel β-C 12G 2 from between thiolated gold surfaces, while for C 12E 6 low loads are sufficient. Fourthly, the adsorption of C 12E 6 and β-C 12G 2 on hydrophilic silica and titania, respectively, is inverted. While the surface excess of C 12E 6 is large on silica and negligible on titania, β-C 12G 2 adsorbs very little on silica but has a large surface excess on titania. What is the reason for this different behaviour? Under similar conditions and for comparable head group sizes, it was found that the hydration of C i E j surfactants is one order of magnitude higher but on average much weaker than that of C n G m surfactants. Moreover, C n G m surfactants possess a rigid maltoside unit, while C i E j surfactants have a very flexible hydrophilic part. Indeed, most of the different properties mentioned above can be explained by the different hydration and the head group flexibilities. The intriguing question of how mixtures of C i E j and C n G m surfactants would behave arises organically. Thus various properties of C 12E 6 + β-C 12G 2 mixtures in aqueous solution have been studied with a focus on the 1:1 mixture. The results are compared with those of the single surfactants and are discussed accordingly.