The successful test taker: exploring test-taking behavior profiles through cluster analysis

• Published in: European journal of psychology of education 2018-04, Vol.33 (2), p.403-417
• Main Authors: Stenlund, Tova, Lyrén, Per-Erik, Eklöf, Hanna
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Achievement Tests; Anxiety; Behavior; Cluster analysis; Education; Educational Psychology; Females; Foreign Countries; Gender differences; Group Testing; Guessing (Tests); High Achievement; High Stakes Tests; High-stakes; Individual Characteristics; Inferences; Low Achievement; Males; Motivation; Multiple Choice Tests; Multivariate Analysis; Pedagogic Psychology; Profiles; Psychology; psykologi; Questionnaires; Risk; Risk-taking; Scores; Student Attitudes; Student Behavior; Student Characteristics; Student Motivation; Teaching Methods; Test Anxiety; Test Items; Test motivation; Test Results; Test Wiseness; Test-taking strategies; Testing
• ISSN: 0256-2928; 1878-5174; 1878-5174
• DOI: 10.1007/s10212-017-0332-2

To be successful in a high-stakes testing situation is desirable for any test taker. It has been found that, beside content knowledge, test-taking behavior, such as risktaking strategies, motivation, and test anxiety, is important for test performance. The purposes of the present study were to identify and group test takers with similar patterns of test-taking behavior and to explore how these groups differ in terms of background characteristics and test performance in a high-stakes achievement test context. A sample of the Swedish Scholastic Assessment Test test takers (N = 1891) completed a questionnaire measuring their motivation, test anxiety, and risk-taking behavior during the test, as well as background characteristics. A two-step cluster analysis revealed three clusters of test takers with significantly different test-taking behavior profiles: a moderate (n = 741), a calm risk taker (n = 637), and a test anxious risk averse (n = 513) profile. Group difference analyses showed that the calm risk taker profile (i.e., a high degree of risktaking together with relatively low levels of test anxiety and motivation during the test) was the most successful profile from a test performance perspective, while the test anxious risk averse profile (i.e., a low degree of risk-taking together with high levels of test anxiety and motivation) was the least successful. Informing prospective test takers about these insights can potentially lead to more valid interpretations and inferences based on the test scores.