Loading…

Vegetation on mesic loamy and sandy soils along a 1700‐km maritime Eurasia Arctic Transect

Questions How do plant communities on zonal loamy vs. sandy soils vary across the full maritime Arctic bioclimate gradient? How are plant communities of these areas related to existing vegetation units of the European Vegetation Classification? What are the main environmental factors controlling tra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied vegetation science 2019-01, Vol.22 (1), p.150-167
Main Authors: Walker, Donald A., Epstein, Howard E., Šibík, Jozef, Bhatt, Uma, Romanovsky, Vladimir E., Breen, Amy L., Chasníková, Silvia, Daanen, Ronald, Druckenmiller, Lisa A., Ermokhina, Ksenia, Forbes, Bruce C., Frost, Gerald V., Geml, Jozsef, Kaärlejarvi, Elina, Khitun, Olga, Khomutov, Artem, Kumpula, Timo, Kuss, Patrick, Matyshak, Georgy, Moskalenko, Natalya, Orekhov, Pavel, Peirce, Jana, Raynolds, Martha K., Timling, Ina, Jiménez‐Alfaro, Borja
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Questions How do plant communities on zonal loamy vs. sandy soils vary across the full maritime Arctic bioclimate gradient? How are plant communities of these areas related to existing vegetation units of the European Vegetation Classification? What are the main environmental factors controlling transitions of vegetation along the bioclimate gradient? Location 1700‐km Eurasia Arctic Transect (EAT), Yamal Peninsula and Franz Josef Land (FJL), Russia. Methods The Braun‐Blanquet approach was used to sample mesic loamy and sandy plots on 14 total study sites at six locations, one in each of the five Arctic bioclimate subzones and the forest–tundra transition. Trends in soil factors, cover of plant growth forms (PGFs) and species diversity were examined along the summer warmth index (SWI) gradient and on loamy and sandy soils. Classification and ordination were used to group the plots and to test relationships between vegetation and environmental factors. Results Clear, mostly non‐linear, trends occurred for soil factors, vegetation structure and species diversity along the climate gradient. Cluster analysis revealed seven groups with clear relationships to subzone and soil texture. Clusters at the ends of the bioclimate gradient (forest–tundra and polar desert) had many highly diagnostic taxa, whereas clusters from the Yamal Peninsula had only a few. Axis 1 of a DCA was strongly correlated with latitude and summer warmth; Axis 2 was strongly correlated with soil moisture, percentage sand and landscape age. Conclusions Summer temperature and soil texture have clear effects on tundra canopy structure and species composition, with consequences for ecosystem properties. Each layer of the plant canopy has a distinct region of peak abundance along the bioclimate gradient. The major vegetation types are weakly aligned with described classes of the European Vegetation Checklist, indicating a continuous floristic gradient rather than distinct subzone regions. The study provides ground‐based vegetation data for satellite‐based interpretations of the western maritime Eurasian Arctic, and the first vegetation data from Hayes Island, Franz Josef Land, which is strongly separated geographically and floristically from the rest of the gradient and most susceptible to on‐going climate change. Ground‐based studies along the EAT aid space‐based monitoring of Arctic vegetation change. This study in the western Russian Arctic documents species and canopy structure patterns related
ISSN:1402-2001
1654-109X
1654-109X
DOI:10.1111/avsc.12401