The multivariate concentric square field test reveals different behavioural profiles in male AA and ANA rats with regard to risk taking and environmental reactivity

• Published in: Behavioural brain research 2007-11, Vol.183 (2), p.195-205
• Main Authors: Roman, Erika, Meyerson, Bengt J., Hyytiä, Petri, Nylander, Ingrid
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Alcohol Drinking - genetics; Alcohol Drinking - psychology; Alcohol-avoiding rat; Alcohol-preferring rat; Animals; Anxiety; Avoidance Learning - physiology; Behavior, Animal - physiology; Behavioral psychophysiology; Biological and medical sciences; Choice Behavior; Elevated plus-maze; Environment; Exploratory Behavior - physiology; FARMACI; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Male; Multivariate Analysis; Open field; PHARMACY; Principal component analysis; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychology. Psychophysiology; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Rats, Mutant Strains; Repeated testing; Risk assessment; Risk-Taking; Statistics, Nonparametric
• ISSN: 0166-4328; 1872-7549; 1872-7549
• DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.06.009

The aim of the present investigation was to compare the behavioural profiles in alcohol-preferring AA (Alko, alcohol) and alcohol-avoiding ANA (Alko, non-alcohol) rats. Twelve adult, alcohol-naïve male AA and ANA rats were tested in the recently established multivariate concentric square field (MCSF) test. The more traditional open field and elevated plus-maze tests were used as reference tests. Six weeks after the initial MCSF test, a repeated testing was used to explore differences in acquired recognition after a previous experience. The results revealed distinct differences between the two lines. The ANA rats were generally more active in the three tests. In the MCSF, parameters of risk taking and shelter seeking indicated differences between the two lines. The ANA rats had higher shelter seeking behaviour and less risk taking behaviour than the AA rats. Repeated exposure to the MCSF caused a general decrease in activity and reduction in the number of visits to the various zones, especially evident in the ANA rats. The ANA rats showed more shelter seeking than the AA rats and also more shelter seeking than in the first trial, supporting an “anxiety-like” profile in these rats. In conclusion, the parameters related to risk taking and shelter seeking revealed obvious differences between AA and ANA rats. The higher risk taking behaviour seen in the AA rats might relate to their innate propensity for high voluntary alcohol intake. The results are discussed in relation to the reported neurobiological differences and in relation to other alcohol-preferring and alcohol-avoiding rat lines.