Loading…

A New Test of Copper and Zinc Abundances in Late-type Stars Using Ultraviolet Cu ii and Zn ii Lines

We present new abundances derived from Cu i , Cu ii , Zn i , and Zn ii lines in six warm (5766 ≤  ≤ 6427 K), metal-poor (−2.50 ≤ [Fe/H] ≤ −0.95) dwarf and subgiant (3.64 ≤ log g ≤ 4.44) stars. These abundances are derived from archival high-resolution ultraviolet spectra from the Space Telescope Ima...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Astrophysical journal 2018-04, Vol.857 (1), p.2
Main Authors: Roederer, Ian U., Barklem, Paul S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We present new abundances derived from Cu i , Cu ii , Zn i , and Zn ii lines in six warm (5766 ≤  ≤ 6427 K), metal-poor (−2.50 ≤ [Fe/H] ≤ −0.95) dwarf and subgiant (3.64 ≤ log g ≤ 4.44) stars. These abundances are derived from archival high-resolution ultraviolet spectra from the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph on board the Hubble Space Telescope and ground-based optical spectra from several observatories. Ionized Cu and Zn are the majority species, and abundances derived from Cu ii and Zn ii lines should be largely insensitive to departures from local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE). We find good agreement between the [Zn/H] ratios derived separately from Zn i and Zn ii lines, suggesting that departures from LTE are, at most, minimal (≲0.1 dex). We find that the [Cu/H] ratios derived from Cu ii lines are 0.36 ± 0.06 dex larger than those derived from Cu i lines in the most metal-poor stars ([Fe/H] < −1.8), suggesting that LTE underestimates the Cu abundance derived from Cu i lines. The deviations decrease in more metal-rich stars. Our results validate previous theoretical non-LTE calculations for both Cu and Zn, supporting earlier conclusions that the enhancement of [Zn/Fe] in metal-poor stars is legitimate, and the deficiency of [Cu/Fe] in metal-poor stars may not be as large as previously thought.
ISSN:0004-637X
1538-4357
1538-4357
DOI:10.3847/1538-4357/aab71f