Loading…
Timing, kinematics and cause of Aegean extension: a scenario based on a comparison with simple analogue experiments
Since the early 1970s, most geodynamic models proposed for the Eastern Mediterranean consider that the initiation of extension in the Aegean, during the late Middle Miocene or later, was a direct consequence of the westward extrusion of Anatolia away from the Arabia–Eurasia collision front. In the l...
Saved in:
Published in: | Tectonophysics 1999-12, Vol.315 (1), p.31-72 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Since the early 1970s, most geodynamic models proposed for the Eastern Mediterranean consider that the initiation of extension in the Aegean, during the late Middle Miocene or later, was a direct consequence of the westward extrusion of Anatolia away from the Arabia–Eurasia collision front. In the late 1990s, a few models have taken into account the increasing evidence for an earlier initiation of Aegean extension, arising mostly from the analysis of deformation within the various Alpine metamorphic complexes of the area. Based largely on our own investigations, we first present a review of the data that reliably constrain the minimum age for the initiation of extension in these complexes. It shows that regional-scale extension with a pattern of stretching orientations similar to that of the Pliocene–Pleistocene was already strongly active in the Aegean before the onset of Arabian indentation into Eurasia (Lower Miocene vs. Middle or Upper Miocene). This implies that the initiation of Aegean extension did not result from the lateral extrusion of Anatolia. Instead, extension may have started, owing to a process of gravity spreading of the continental lithosphere that had previously been thickened during Alpine collision. The main arguments favouring this interpretation are presented, and a preliminary scenario is proposed for the Neogene evolution of the Eastern Mediterranean, in which lateral extrusion of Anatolia occurred lately during southward spreading of the Aegean lithosphere.
In order to test this hypothesis further, physical experiments simulating the horizontal spreading of a continental lithosphere toward a free boundary have been carried out. The analysis of various elements of the deformation field (displacements, strain, rotations, fault pattern and kinematics), both in the experiments and in the Aegean domain, reveals an excellent agreement between the two. Not only do early stages of Aegean extension appear to fit the gravity spreading hypothesis, but so does the recent to present internal deformation of the Aegean. Transverse (≈E–W) active shortening observed in the northern Aegean is commonly taken as one of the most striking pieces of evidence that Aegean extension results from the lateral extrusion of Anatolia. The experiments indicate that such transverse shortening may equally develop as a result of pure gravity spreading, associated with a pattern of faults and rotations that compares well with that of the northern Aegean. Pure dextra |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0040-1951 1879-3266 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0040-1951(99)00281-4 |