Loading…

Evaluation of Different Cleaning Strategies for Removal of Contaminating DNA Molecules

Decontamination strategies and their efficiencies are crucial when performing routine forensic analysis, and many factors influence the choice of agent to use. In this study, the effects of ten different cleaning strategies were evaluated to compare their ability to remove contaminating DNA molecule...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Genes 2022-01, Vol.13 (1), p.162
Main Authors: Nilsson, Martina, De Maeyer, Hanne, Allen, Marie
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-36eea751eae81ed2274fe1766389b042ceddf32e10df546b25c3f771c44a33163
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-36eea751eae81ed2274fe1766389b042ceddf32e10df546b25c3f771c44a33163
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 162
container_title Genes
container_volume 13
creator Nilsson, Martina
De Maeyer, Hanne
Allen, Marie
description Decontamination strategies and their efficiencies are crucial when performing routine forensic analysis, and many factors influence the choice of agent to use. In this study, the effects of ten different cleaning strategies were evaluated to compare their ability to remove contaminating DNA molecules. Cell-free DNA or blood was deposited on three surfaces (plastic, metal, and wood) and decontaminated with various treatments. The quantities of recovered DNA, obtained by swabbing the surfaces after cleaning using the different strategies, was analyzed by real-time PCR. Large differences in the DNA removal efficiencies were observed between different cleaning strategies, as well as between different surfaces. The most efficient cleaning strategies for cell-free DNA were the different sodium hypochlorite solutions and Trigene , for which a maximum of 0.3% DNA was recovered on all three surfaces. For blood, a maximum of 0.8% of the deposited DNA was recovered after using Virkon for decontamination. The recoveries after using these cleaning strategies correspond to DNA from only a few cells, out of 60 ng of cell-free DNA or thousands of deposited blood cells.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/genes13010162
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_uu_469564</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2621282081</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-36eea751eae81ed2274fe1766389b042ceddf32e10df546b25c3f771c44a33163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0c1rFDEUAPAgFlvaHr3KgBcPjk1evmYvwrJbW6Eq-NFryM68jCkzSZvMVPzvm2Vr6ZpLAvm9x_sg5DWjHzhf0LMeA2bGKaNMwQtyBFTzWgiQL5-9D8lpzje0HEGBUvmKHHJJJUgKR-T6_N4Os518DFV01do7hwnDVK0GtMGHvvoxJTth7zFXLqbqO46xhGzxKobJjj6U6OLWX5fVlzhgOw-YT8iBs0PG08f7mPz6dP5zdVlffbv4vFpe1a2QMNVcIVotGVpsGHYAWjhkWineLDZUQItd5zggo52TQm1AttxpzVohLOdM8WPyfpc3_8HbeWNukx9t-mui9Wbtr5cmpt7MsxFqIZUo_OOOFzti15ZGkx32ovZ_gv9t-nhvGq3LuHRJ8O4xQYp3M-bJjD63OAw2YJyzAQUADdecFfr2P3oT5xTKNLaKQQO02ap6p9oUc07onoph1Gx3bPZ2XPyb5x086X8b5Q_05qKb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2621282081</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Different Cleaning Strategies for Removal of Contaminating DNA Molecules</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Nilsson, Martina ; De Maeyer, Hanne ; Allen, Marie</creator><creatorcontrib>Nilsson, Martina ; De Maeyer, Hanne ; Allen, Marie</creatorcontrib><description>Decontamination strategies and their efficiencies are crucial when performing routine forensic analysis, and many factors influence the choice of agent to use. In this study, the effects of ten different cleaning strategies were evaluated to compare their ability to remove contaminating DNA molecules. Cell-free DNA or blood was deposited on three surfaces (plastic, metal, and wood) and decontaminated with various treatments. The quantities of recovered DNA, obtained by swabbing the surfaces after cleaning using the different strategies, was analyzed by real-time PCR. Large differences in the DNA removal efficiencies were observed between different cleaning strategies, as well as between different surfaces. The most efficient cleaning strategies for cell-free DNA were the different sodium hypochlorite solutions and Trigene , for which a maximum of 0.3% DNA was recovered on all three surfaces. For blood, a maximum of 0.8% of the deposited DNA was recovered after using Virkon for decontamination. The recoveries after using these cleaning strategies correspond to DNA from only a few cells, out of 60 ng of cell-free DNA or thousands of deposited blood cells.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4425</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4425</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/genes13010162</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35052502</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Blood cells ; Cleaning ; cleaning strategies ; Crime scenes ; Decontamination ; Decontamination - methods ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; DNA - blood ; DNA Contamination ; DNA molecules ; Efficiency ; Ethanol ; Forensic science ; Households ; Humans ; Laboratories ; Male ; Mitochondrial DNA ; Sodium ; Sodium hypochlorite ; Specimen Handling - methods ; Specimen Handling - standards ; Ultraviolet radiation</subject><ispartof>Genes, 2022-01, Vol.13 (1), p.162</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-36eea751eae81ed2274fe1766389b042ceddf32e10df546b25c3f771c44a33163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-36eea751eae81ed2274fe1766389b042ceddf32e10df546b25c3f771c44a33163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2621282081/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2621282081?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35052502$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-469564$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nilsson, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Maeyer, Hanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Marie</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Different Cleaning Strategies for Removal of Contaminating DNA Molecules</title><title>Genes</title><addtitle>Genes (Basel)</addtitle><description>Decontamination strategies and their efficiencies are crucial when performing routine forensic analysis, and many factors influence the choice of agent to use. In this study, the effects of ten different cleaning strategies were evaluated to compare their ability to remove contaminating DNA molecules. Cell-free DNA or blood was deposited on three surfaces (plastic, metal, and wood) and decontaminated with various treatments. The quantities of recovered DNA, obtained by swabbing the surfaces after cleaning using the different strategies, was analyzed by real-time PCR. Large differences in the DNA removal efficiencies were observed between different cleaning strategies, as well as between different surfaces. The most efficient cleaning strategies for cell-free DNA were the different sodium hypochlorite solutions and Trigene , for which a maximum of 0.3% DNA was recovered on all three surfaces. For blood, a maximum of 0.8% of the deposited DNA was recovered after using Virkon for decontamination. The recoveries after using these cleaning strategies correspond to DNA from only a few cells, out of 60 ng of cell-free DNA or thousands of deposited blood cells.</description><subject>Blood cells</subject><subject>Cleaning</subject><subject>cleaning strategies</subject><subject>Crime scenes</subject><subject>Decontamination</subject><subject>Decontamination - methods</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA - blood</subject><subject>DNA Contamination</subject><subject>DNA molecules</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Ethanol</subject><subject>Forensic science</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mitochondrial DNA</subject><subject>Sodium</subject><subject>Sodium hypochlorite</subject><subject>Specimen Handling - methods</subject><subject>Specimen Handling - standards</subject><subject>Ultraviolet radiation</subject><issn>2073-4425</issn><issn>2073-4425</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0c1rFDEUAPAgFlvaHr3KgBcPjk1evmYvwrJbW6Eq-NFryM68jCkzSZvMVPzvm2Vr6ZpLAvm9x_sg5DWjHzhf0LMeA2bGKaNMwQtyBFTzWgiQL5-9D8lpzje0HEGBUvmKHHJJJUgKR-T6_N4Os518DFV01do7hwnDVK0GtMGHvvoxJTth7zFXLqbqO46xhGzxKobJjj6U6OLWX5fVlzhgOw-YT8iBs0PG08f7mPz6dP5zdVlffbv4vFpe1a2QMNVcIVotGVpsGHYAWjhkWineLDZUQItd5zggo52TQm1AttxpzVohLOdM8WPyfpc3_8HbeWNukx9t-mui9Wbtr5cmpt7MsxFqIZUo_OOOFzti15ZGkx32ovZ_gv9t-nhvGq3LuHRJ8O4xQYp3M-bJjD63OAw2YJyzAQUADdecFfr2P3oT5xTKNLaKQQO02ap6p9oUc07onoph1Gx3bPZ2XPyb5x086X8b5Q_05qKb</recordid><startdate>20220117</startdate><enddate>20220117</enddate><creator>Nilsson, Martina</creator><creator>De Maeyer, Hanne</creator><creator>Allen, Marie</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ACNBI</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>DF2</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220117</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Different Cleaning Strategies for Removal of Contaminating DNA Molecules</title><author>Nilsson, Martina ; De Maeyer, Hanne ; Allen, Marie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-36eea751eae81ed2274fe1766389b042ceddf32e10df546b25c3f771c44a33163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Blood cells</topic><topic>Cleaning</topic><topic>cleaning strategies</topic><topic>Crime scenes</topic><topic>Decontamination</topic><topic>Decontamination - methods</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA - blood</topic><topic>DNA Contamination</topic><topic>DNA molecules</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Ethanol</topic><topic>Forensic science</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mitochondrial DNA</topic><topic>Sodium</topic><topic>Sodium hypochlorite</topic><topic>Specimen Handling - methods</topic><topic>Specimen Handling - standards</topic><topic>Ultraviolet radiation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nilsson, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Maeyer, Hanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Marie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SWEPUB Uppsala universitet full text</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SWEPUB Uppsala universitet</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>Genes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nilsson, Martina</au><au>De Maeyer, Hanne</au><au>Allen, Marie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Different Cleaning Strategies for Removal of Contaminating DNA Molecules</atitle><jtitle>Genes</jtitle><addtitle>Genes (Basel)</addtitle><date>2022-01-17</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>162</spage><pages>162-</pages><issn>2073-4425</issn><eissn>2073-4425</eissn><abstract>Decontamination strategies and their efficiencies are crucial when performing routine forensic analysis, and many factors influence the choice of agent to use. In this study, the effects of ten different cleaning strategies were evaluated to compare their ability to remove contaminating DNA molecules. Cell-free DNA or blood was deposited on three surfaces (plastic, metal, and wood) and decontaminated with various treatments. The quantities of recovered DNA, obtained by swabbing the surfaces after cleaning using the different strategies, was analyzed by real-time PCR. Large differences in the DNA removal efficiencies were observed between different cleaning strategies, as well as between different surfaces. The most efficient cleaning strategies for cell-free DNA were the different sodium hypochlorite solutions and Trigene , for which a maximum of 0.3% DNA was recovered on all three surfaces. For blood, a maximum of 0.8% of the deposited DNA was recovered after using Virkon for decontamination. The recoveries after using these cleaning strategies correspond to DNA from only a few cells, out of 60 ng of cell-free DNA or thousands of deposited blood cells.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>35052502</pmid><doi>10.3390/genes13010162</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2073-4425
ispartof Genes, 2022-01, Vol.13 (1), p.162
issn 2073-4425
2073-4425
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_uu_469564
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Blood cells
Cleaning
cleaning strategies
Crime scenes
Decontamination
Decontamination - methods
Deoxyribonucleic acid
DNA
DNA - blood
DNA Contamination
DNA molecules
Efficiency
Ethanol
Forensic science
Households
Humans
Laboratories
Male
Mitochondrial DNA
Sodium
Sodium hypochlorite
Specimen Handling - methods
Specimen Handling - standards
Ultraviolet radiation
title Evaluation of Different Cleaning Strategies for Removal of Contaminating DNA Molecules
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T12%3A35%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Different%20Cleaning%20Strategies%20for%20Removal%20of%20Contaminating%20DNA%20Molecules&rft.jtitle=Genes&rft.au=Nilsson,%20Martina&rft.date=2022-01-17&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=162&rft.pages=162-&rft.issn=2073-4425&rft.eissn=2073-4425&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/genes13010162&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2621282081%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-36eea751eae81ed2274fe1766389b042ceddf32e10df546b25c3f771c44a33163%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2621282081&rft_id=info:pmid/35052502&rfr_iscdi=true