Loading…
Characteristics and outcome in patients with central nervous system involvement treated in European pediatric acute myeloid leukemia study groups
Background There is no consensus on the treatment for pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia and initial central nervous system (CNS) involvement. Methods To evaluate different CNS‐directed treatment options (intrathecal [IT] therapy, CNS irradiation, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation...
Saved in:
Published in: | Pediatric blood & cancer 2017-12, Vol.64 (12), p.n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
There is no consensus on the treatment for pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia and initial central nervous system (CNS) involvement.
Methods
To evaluate different CNS‐directed treatment options (intrathecal [IT] therapy, CNS irradiation, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation [HSCT]), 261 patients (excluding acute promyelocytic leukemia) with initial CNS involvement treated in trials with similar intensive chemotherapy by four cooperative European study groups (1998–2013) were studied and compared with CNS‐negative patients from the Berlin–Frankfurt–Münster group.
Results
Patient characteristics in the different study groups were comparable. Young age, high white blood cell count, extramedullary involvement other than the CNS, monoblastic morphology, and inv(16) were associated with CNS involvement (each P < 0.0001). There were no major differences in outcome between the study groups. The cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) regarding the CNS was higher in initially CNS‐positive versus initially CNS‐negative patients (all: 8 ± 2% vs. 3 ± 1%, P(Gray) = 0.001; isolated: 4 ± 1% vs. 1 ± 0%, P(Gray) = 0.03). However, global outcome of the CNS‐positive cohort (overall survival, 64 ± 3%; event‐free survival 48 ± 3%; and CIR 33% ± 3%) did not differ significantly from CNS‐negative patients. Risk groups defined by cytogenetics were of likewise prognostic significance in CNS‐positive and ‐negative patients. CNS treatment with cranial irradiation was not superior compared to IT therapy and systemic chemotherapy (± HSCT).
Conclusion
Although CNS relapses occurred more frequently in initially CNS‐positive patients, their global outcome was similar as in CNS‐negative patients. Intensified IT therapy was heterogeneous; however, at least eight applications, preferably with triple IT chemotherapy, seem to be appropriate to accompany dose‐intensive systemic chemotherapy. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1545-5009 1545-5017 1545-5017 |
DOI: | 10.1002/pbc.26664 |