The Limits of a Commitment? Public Responses to Asylum Policy in Sweden over Time

• Published in: Scandinavian political studies 2018-09, Vol.41 (3), p.307-335
• Main Authors: Andersson, Dennis, Bendz, Anna, Olofsdotter Stensöta, Helena
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 1993; 1995; am j political sci; american political science review; Attitudes; Change agents; Citizens; communication; Disputes; dynamic representation; Exaggeration; Feedback; Government & Law; Immigration; Immigration policy; imson ja; llicarpini mx; Mass media; opinion; p543; Policy making; Political asylum; Political attitudes; Political Science; Public opinion; Refugees; Responsiveness; self-interest; social-policy; Statsvetenskap; Telecommunications policy; v0037; v89; Visualization; welfare
• ISSN: 0080-6757; 1467-9477
• DOI: 10.1111/1467-9477.12125

It is hardly an exaggeration to claim that one of the most turbulent political areas in recent years has been asylum policy, which has disclosed a rapidly increasing inflow of asylum seekers, and, in many countries, has been followed by fierce media discussion and political controversies. In Sweden, this development has been heated as the Swedish self‐image is one of providing generous policies, which is also reflected in terms of strong refugee policy. The article uses this example to explore assumptions about public responsiveness in previous policy feedback literature and to examine the link between citizens' attitudes towards immigration and changes in asylum policy output, measured as asylums granted, over time in the period 1990–2015. It focuses especially on the link through which citizens become aware of policy output, operationalized as media visualization, and find that including media reveals a suppressed relationship between policy output and public attitudes. The relationship is negative and thus confirms the assumptions of the thermostatic models. Second, the article shows that feedback is mediated by political orientation: People defining themselves politically as right‐oriented respond with negative feedback when the number of granted asylums increases, while left‐oriented people do not change their attitudes. Based on these findings it is concluded, first, that analyses of democratic responsiveness need to incorporate a clear measure of the link by which exogenous factors become visible. Second, the importance needs to be stressed of considering important cleavages in the population in order to display responsiveness processes fairly.