Loading…

Efficacy and safety of lobeglitazone, a new Thiazolidinedione, as compared to the standard of care in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lobeglitazone as compared to the standard of care (SOC) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Databases were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was the compa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Diabetes & metabolic syndrome clinical research & reviews 2023-01, Vol.17 (1), p.102703-102703, Article 102703
Main Authors: Joshi, Shashank R., Das, Saibal, Xaviar, Suja, Samajdar, Shambo Samrat, Saha, Indranil, Sarkar, Sougata, Mukherjee, Shatavisa, Tripathi, Santanu Kumar, Pal, Jyotirmoy, Chatterjee, Nandini
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lobeglitazone as compared to the standard of care (SOC) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Databases were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was the comparison of the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) level after 24 weeks. Pooled mean differences and odds ratios were calculated using random-effects models. Of 267 studies that were screened, four were included. Treatment with adjunct lobeglitazone showed a reduction in the HbA1C level [mean difference: −0.23% (95% CI: −0.62 to 0.16); p = 0.24; i2: 87%; moderate GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and. Evaluation) of evidence], fasting blood glucose level [mean difference: −7.12 mg/dl (95% CI: −20.09 to 5.85); p = 0.28; i2: 87%; moderate GRADE of evidence], and lipid profile as compared to those following treatment with the SOC; however, the changes were not statistically significant. The risk of hypoglycemia was significantly lower [odds ratio: 0.24 (95% CI: 0.08 to 0.70); p 
ISSN:1871-4021
1878-0334
DOI:10.1016/j.dsx.2022.102703