Reasons for presenteeism in different occupational branches in Sweden: a population based cross-sectional study

• Published in: International archives of occupational and environmental health 2021, Vol.94 (6), p.1385-1395
• Main Authors: Marklund, Staffan, Gustafsson, Klas, Bergström, Gunnar, Leineweber, Constanze
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Categories; Confidence intervals; Cross sectional study; Cross-sectional studies; Demography; Earth and Environmental Science; Employees; Employment sector; Environment; Environmental Health; Medicin och hälsovetenskap; Occupational branches; Occupational health; Occupational Medicine/Industrial Medicine; Occupations; Original; Original Article; Population studies; Population-based studies; Presenteeism; Regression analysis; Rehabilitation; Statistical analysis; Symbols; Working conditions
• ISSN: 0340-0131; 1432-1246; 1432-1246
• DOI: 10.1007/s00420-021-01701-2

Objective To compare the prevalence and reasons for presenteeism in occupations in three branches defined as employees handling people, handling things or handling symbols. Method A cross-sectional population-based cohort study was conducted. The study group was drawn from a representative sample ( n  = 6230) aged 16–64, who had been interviewed in 2015 or in 2017 for the Swedish Work Environment Surveys (SWES). The odds ratios (ORs) stratified by occupational category for reasons of presenteeism, with 95% confidence intervals (CI), were estimated using binomial multiple logistic regression analysis. Results The study showed that presenteeism was more common among employees handling people (74%), when compared to employees handling things (65%) or handling symbols (70%). The most common reason for presenteeism among employees handling people was “I do not want to burden my colleagues”, while “Because nobody else can carry out my responsibilities” was most common in the other two categories. After control for socio-demography, work environments and health, the differences in reasons mostly remained significant between the three occupational categories. Conclusion The differences between occupational categories are important for prevalence and reasons for presenteeism. As presenteeism affects the future health of employees and the productivity of the work unit, attempts to reduce presenteeism may be important. Because the reasons vary between occupations, customized preventive measures should be applied in different occupational settings. Among employees handling people, covering up for absence in work team is relevant, while among employees handling symbols and handling things the corresponding focus could be on shared responsibilities for specific tasks.