Loading…
Slow‐release vaginal insert of misoprostol versus orally administrated solution of misoprostol for the induction of labour in primiparous term pregnant women: a randomised controlled trial
Objective To compare the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended orally administrated dosage of misoprostol (25 μg) with a vaginal slow‐release (7 μg/hour) insert of misoprostol regarding time from induction to delivery and safety of the method. Design Open label, Randomised controlled trial (RC...
Saved in:
Published in: | BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2019-08, Vol.126 (9), p.1148-1155 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objective
To compare the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended orally administrated dosage of misoprostol (25 μg) with a vaginal slow‐release (7 μg/hour) insert of misoprostol regarding time from induction to delivery and safety of the method.
Design
Open label, Randomised controlled trial (RCT).
Setting
Delivery ward at a secondary referral hospital in Stockholm, Sweden, from 1 October 2016 to 21 February 2018.
Population
One hundred and ninety‐six primiparous women with singletons in cephalic presentation at ≥37 weeks of gestation and with a Bishop score of ≤4.
Methods
Women were randomised to an oral solution of misoprostol (Cytotec® n = 99) or vaginal slow‐release misoprostol (Misodel® [MVI] n = 97).
Main outcome measures
Primary outcome: time from induction to vaginal delivery. Secondary outcomes: mode of delivery; proportion of vaginal deliveries within 24 hours (VD24); neonates with an Apgar score of |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1470-0328 1471-0528 1471-0528 |
DOI: | 10.1111/1471-0528.15796 |