Loading…

Slow‐release vaginal insert of misoprostol versus orally administrated solution of misoprostol for the induction of labour in primiparous term pregnant women: a randomised controlled trial

Objective To compare the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended orally administrated dosage of misoprostol (25 μg) with a vaginal slow‐release (7 μg/hour) insert of misoprostol regarding time from induction to delivery and safety of the method. Design Open label, Randomised controlled trial (RC...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2019-08, Vol.126 (9), p.1148-1155
Main Authors: Wallström, T, Strandberg, M, Gemzell‐Danielsson, K, Pilo, C, Jarnbert‐Pettersson, H, Friman‐Mathiasson, M, Wiberg‐Itzel, E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective To compare the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended orally administrated dosage of misoprostol (25 μg) with a vaginal slow‐release (7 μg/hour) insert of misoprostol regarding time from induction to delivery and safety of the method. Design Open label, Randomised controlled trial (RCT). Setting Delivery ward at a secondary referral hospital in Stockholm, Sweden, from 1 October 2016 to 21 February 2018. Population One hundred and ninety‐six primiparous women with singletons in cephalic presentation at ≥37 weeks of gestation and with a Bishop score of ≤4. Methods Women were randomised to an oral solution of misoprostol (Cytotec® n = 99) or vaginal slow‐release misoprostol (Misodel® [MVI] n = 97). Main outcome measures Primary outcome: time from induction to vaginal delivery. Secondary outcomes: mode of delivery; proportion of vaginal deliveries within 24 hours (VD24); neonates with an Apgar score of
ISSN:1470-0328
1471-0528
1471-0528
DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.15796