Quality of Life after Dislocation of Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study on 319 Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures with a One-Year Follow-up

• Published in: Quality of life research 2009-11, Vol.18 (9), p.1177-1184
• Main Authors: Enocson, Anders, Pettersson, Hans, Ponzer, Sari, Törnkvist, Hans, Dalén, Nils, Tidermark, Jan
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthroplasty; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Clinical and Policy Applications; Cohort analysis; Cohort Studies; Female; Femoral neck fractures; Femoral Neck Fractures - surgery; Femur neck; Follow-Up Studies; Fractures; Hip; Hip Dislocation - surgery; Hip fractures; Hip replacement arthroplasty; Humans; Joint dislocations; Joint surgery; Male; Medicin och hälsovetenskap; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Middle Aged; Older people; Prospective Studies; Prosthetics; Public Health; Quality of Life; Quality of Life Research; Sociology; Surgery; Surgical specialties; Surveys and Questionnaires; Sweden
• ISSN: 0962-9343; 1573-2649; 1573-2649
• DOI: 10.1007/s11136-009-9531-x

Purpose A primary arthroplasty constitutes a standard procedure in the treatment of patients with displaced fractures of the femoral neck. Although dislocation of the prosthesis remains a significant clinical problem, there are no previous reports on its influence on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We analysed how a dislocation of the hip arthroplasty influenced the patients' HRQoL. Methods In total 319 consecutive patients with a displaced fracture of the femoral neck treated with a primary arthroplasty were included in a prospective cohort study. We used a mixed-effects model regression analysis to evaluate factors of importance for HRQoL (EQ-5D ¡ ndex score) during the first 12 months following surgery. Results A dislocation of the arthroplasty occurred in 21 of the 319 patients (7%), 8 of whom had a single dislocation and 13 recurrent dislocations. At 4 months, the EQ-5D index score displayed a significantly worse outcome for patients with recurrent dislocations compared to patients with no dislocation (P = 0.001), and a trend towards a worse outcome for patients with a single dislocation (P = 0.08). At 12 months, the mean EQ-5D index score of patients with recurrent dislocations was still substantially lower (P = 0.001), while the EQ-5D index score for patients with a single dislocation had returned to a level similar to that of patients with no dislocation. Our analysis of the EQ-5D dimensions indicates that the difference was mainly due to perceived difficulties in self-care and usual activities and increased problems with anxiety/depression. Conclusions A recurrent dislocation of the hip arthroplasty in the treatment of patients with femoral neck fractures seems to result in a persisting deterioration in the HRQoL, while patients with a single dislocation seem to experience only a temporary deterioration.