Loading…
Does a short interval between two pap smears significantly affect the result of the second smear?
Background: Only limited data is available on the impact of a short interval between two pap smears. Most institutions practice a minimal time span of six to eight weeks before obtaining a second smear. A short interval is commonly believed to be associated with an increase of false-negative results...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference Proceeding |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background:
Only limited data is available on the impact of a short interval between two pap smears. Most institutions practice a minimal time span of six to eight weeks before obtaining a second smear. A short interval is commonly believed to be associated with an increase of false-negative results in the second smear.
Methods:
Two consecutive pap smears were obtained from 81 women. 41 smears were processed using the conventional technique, whereas liquid-based cytology was used in the remaining 40 women. Smears were evaluated by 4 different cytopathologists. We analyzed the effect of the short time interval, the different processing techniques and individual differences in the cytological evaluation.
Results:
There were no significant differences in the cytological evaluation of the two consecutive pap smears (p = 0,07). Further, there were no significant differences between conservative and liquid based cytology (p = 0,31). However, the interobserver variability was high and had a significant impact on the overall results (p < 0,01).
Conclusion:
Pap smears can be repeated immediately without a significant impact on the result. Interobserver variability of different cytopathologists is high and should be kept in mind when evaluating cytology results. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0016-5751 1438-8804 |
DOI: | 10.1055/s-0036-1593054 |