Strong Steam, Weak Patents, or the Myth of Watt’s Innovation-Blocking Monopoly, Exploded

James Watt’s 1769 patent is widely supposed to have stood in the way of the development of high-pressure steam technology until it finally expired in 1800. We dispute this popular claim. We show that although it is true that high-pressure steam technology developed only after the expiration of Watt’...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of law & economics 2011-11, Vol.54 (4), p.841-861
Main Authors: Selgin, George, Turner, John L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Boilers
Engines
Inventions
Monopoly
Pistons
Steam
Steam engines
Steam power
Studies
Sulfuric acid
Technology
Vacuum
Watt, James (1736-1819)
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:James Watt’s 1769 patent is widely supposed to have stood in the way of the development of high-pressure steam technology until it finally expired in 1800. We dispute this popular claim. We show that although it is true that high-pressure steam technology developed only after the expiration of Watt’s patent, the delay was due to factors other than that patent itself, including the widely held opinion that the use of high-pressure engines were excessively risky. Indeed, Watt’s monopoly rights may actually have hastened the development of the high-pressure steam engine by inspiring Richard Trevithick to revive a supposedly obsolete technology so as to invent around them.
ISSN:0022-2186
1537-5285
DOI:10.1086/658495