GROUP DIFFERENCES IN THE AESTHETIC EVALUATION OF NATURE DEVELOPMENT PLANS: A MULTILEVEL APPROACH

The study presented here addresses theoretical, methodological and practical aspects of the issue of group differences in the aesthetic evaluation of natural landscapes. Beauty ratings of an agrarian landscape and five computer simulations of nature development plans in this landscape were collected...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of environmental psychology 1998-06, Vol.18 (2), p.141-157
Main Authors: van den Berg, Agnes E., Vlek, Charles A.J., Coeterier, J.Frederick
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aesthetics
Applied psychology
Biological and medical sciences
Environment. Ecology
Evaluation
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Group differentiation
Natural landscapes
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Staring Centrum
Winand Staring Centre for Integrated Land, Soil and Water Research
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The study presented here addresses theoretical, methodological and practical aspects of the issue of group differences in the aesthetic evaluation of natural landscapes. Beauty ratings of an agrarian landscape and five computer simulations of nature development plans in this landscape were collected in a field study. Three different user groups, each consisting of 28 respondents, were distinguished: farmers, residents (nonfarmers) and visiting cyclists. Ratings on predictor variables were given by the respondents themselves, as well as by a group of 12 experts on nature development. Results of multilevel statistical analysis show differences in beauty ratings of nature development plans as a function of user background. Beauty ratings of residents and visitors were positively related to typical characteristics of nature development plans (wetness, roughness and noncultivatedness), while farmers" beauty ratings were negatively related to these characteristics. In each group, beauty ratings were positively related to perceived complexity, coherence, mystery and biodiversity. However, perceptions of these characteristics were found to be highly subjective. Possible explanations of the user-group differences in terms of background variables such as familiarity and education level are discussed, as well as implications for theoretical and management concerns.
ISSN:0272-4944
1522-9610
DOI:10.1006/jevp.1998.0080