Learning and Innovation in Agriculture and Rural Development: The Use of the Concepts of Boundary Work and Boundary Objects

Purpose: The paper explores the role of boundary work and boundary objects in enhancing learning and innovation processes in hybrid multi-actor networks for sustainable agriculture (LINSA). Design/Methodology/Approach: Boundary work in LINSA is analysed on the basis of six case studies carried out i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of agricultural education and extension 2015-01, Vol.21 (1), p.13-33
Main Authors: Tisenkopfs, Talis, Kunda, Ilona, šūmane, Sandra, Brunori, Gianluca, Klerkx, Laurens, Moschitz, Heidrun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Acculturation
Agricultural Education
Agriculture
Boundary objects
Boundary work
Case Studies
Classification
Drinking water
Educational Innovation
Innovation
Interaction
Kennis, Technologie and Innovatie
Knowledge Technology and Innovation
Learning
Learning Processes
LINSA
Rural Development
Social services
Sustainability
Sustainable Development
WASS
Women
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose: The paper explores the role of boundary work and boundary objects in enhancing learning and innovation processes in hybrid multi-actor networks for sustainable agriculture (LINSA). Design/Methodology/Approach: Boundary work in LINSA is analysed on the basis of six case studies carried out in SOLINSA project under a common methodology. In developing typologies of boundary work and objects, a grounded approach is used. Findings: LINSA analysis demonstrates the dynamic character, diverse forms and multiple functions of boundary work and objects in three domains: learning, innovation, and sustainability. Addressing specific types of goals and actors leads to specific types of boundary work and boundary objects. Context-appropriate boundary work allows aligning differing actor attitudes, gaining increased external support, and developing LINSA. The concepts of boundary work and boundary objects are relevant in a broad range of divergent LINSA settings. Boundary work has its limitations, but its facilitation supports reaching LINSA goals. Practical Implications: The paper proposes recognising context-appropriate forms of boundary work and skilful use of emerging boundary objects to both promote internal consolidation of LINSA and effective external communication to foster learning and innovation for sustainability. Originality/Value: The paper provides insights into the forms, dynamic and outcomes of boundary work in LINSA in three key domains: developing shared knowledge base, co-producing innovation and negotiating sustainability.
ISSN:1389-224X
1750-8622
DOI:10.1080/1389224X.2014.991115