Loading…

Adsorption and Photocatalytic Degradation of Anionic and Cationic Surfactants on Nitrogen‐Modified TiO2

Adsorption and photocatalytic decomposition of anionic and cationic surfactants are presented. Two different types of photocatalysts were studied, commercial TiO2‐P25 (Evonik) with pHpzc = 5.65 and nitrogen‐modified TiO2/N pHpzc = 6.7 (point of zero charge). Two different types of surfactants were u...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of surfactants and detergents 2018-11, Vol.21 (6), p.909-921
Main Authors: Kuźmiński, Kamil, Morawski, Antoni W., Janus, Magdalena
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Adsorption and photocatalytic decomposition of anionic and cationic surfactants are presented. Two different types of photocatalysts were studied, commercial TiO2‐P25 (Evonik) with pHpzc = 5.65 and nitrogen‐modified TiO2/N pHpzc = 6.7 (point of zero charge). Two different types of surfactants were used: anionic surfactant NaDBS (sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate) and cationic surfactant BtCl (benzethonium chloride). Obtained adsorption isotherms of NaDBS and BtCl comply with the conditions of monolayer Langmuir model isotherms. The maximal anionic surfactant adsorption took place at acidic pH and it was higher for TiO2/N (196 mg g−1) than for commercial TiO2‐P25 (140 mg g−1). There was the opposite situation in the case of cationic surfactants, higher adsorption took place at alkaline condition and it was higher for TiO2/N (100 mg g−1) than for commercial TiO2‐P25 (85 mg g−1). Photocatalytic degradation has been found to be more effective in neutral and high than in low pH solutions for both surfactants. It is mainly the difference between charges of the surface of photocatalysts and ionic parts of individual surfactants that determined the effectiveness for each of them.
ISSN:1097-3958
1558-9293
DOI:10.1002/jsde.12190