Loading…

Abstract 13987: Underutilization of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in At-Risk Patients With Atrial Fibrillation—Insights From a Multistate Healthcare System

IntroductionOral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy significantly reduces the risk of thromboembolism among at-risk patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Current guidelines provide strong support for an OAC in men and women with AF and CHA2DS2-VASc scores of >2 and >3, respectively. In spite of thi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2019-11, Vol.140 (Suppl_1 Suppl 1), p.A13987-A13987
Main Authors: Gluckman, Ty J, Ali, Amir, Wang, Mansen, Mun, Howard, Alfred, Sally, Petersen, John L
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:IntroductionOral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy significantly reduces the risk of thromboembolism among at-risk patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Current guidelines provide strong support for an OAC in men and women with AF and CHA2DS2-VASc scores of >2 and >3, respectively. In spite of this, previous data has suggested that up to 40% of these patients are not treated in accordance with guideline recommendations.HypothesisWe hypothesized that OAC therapy continues to remain significantly underutilized among at-risk patients with AF in real-world settings.MethodsWe sought to evaluate the prevalence of OAC underuse and contributing factors in an ambulatory population of at-risk AF patients within a large multistate healthcare system. EHR and coding (ICD-10) data were used to identify patients with AF, calculate their CHA2DS2-VASc score, and define their current antithrombotic regimen. Demographics were assessed to allow for comparison between those receiving an OAC from those who were not. Chi square or Fisher exact tests were used to examine differences between groups.ResultsData was pulled from our EHR on 8/1/18, identifying 147,455 unique patients with AF, of which 102,728 (76.3%) had a CHA2DS2-VASc score >2 (excluding female gender) (Table). Compared to those on an OAC, patients on antiplatelet therapy were more likely to have coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, and prior MI (p
ISSN:0009-7322
1524-4539
DOI:10.1161/circ.140.suppl_1.13987