Rape myths, jury deliberations, and conversation analysis: examining conversational practices used to undermine rape complainants within (mock) jury deliberations
Despite decades of research and policy campaigns, low rates of reports, prosecutions and convictions in rape cases persist. Culturally shared prejudicial beliefs, known as ‘rape myths’, are widely reported to undermine the perceived credibility of complainants in jury deliberations. Most evidence of...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Default Article |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/2134/29327093.v1 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|